the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Review article: Arctic polynyas in a changing climate
Abstract. The Arctic is the fastest changing region in the world. Its atmosphere is warming 3–4 times the global average; the ocean is warming through increased advection of heat from the Atlantic and Pacific; the sea ice cover is disappearing, thinning, and becoming more mobile. The interactions between ocean, ice and atmosphere are also evolving. These changes are manifest in polynyas, openings in the sea ice that are crucial for exchanges of heat, moisture, momentum and gases between ocean and atmosphere, but also for ecosystems, Indigenous communities, and navigation. We here review how polynyas and their impact on the climate system have changed throughout the satellite record, focussing on the last twenty years. The trend is of fewer but larger polynyas that open for longer, unless they depend on ice arches (in which case they are shorter-lived). Many regions have switched from ''latent heat'' polynyas, only driven by dynamics, to ''hybrid'', where the heat from ocean or atmosphere matters. Consistent with that switch and with an overall warming and wetting of the atmosphere, moisture fluxes from polynyas in winter seem to be decreasing despite an increase in polynya area. How this will impact the low altitude clouds, generated by polynyas and that help maintain polynyas, has not been studied. Similarly, sea ice production in polynyas is decreasing at the pan-Arctic scale. In the ocean's Eurasian basin, process studies suggest a conflict between this switch to hybrid polynyas (suppressing dense water formation) and Atlantification (favouring it). In the Amerasian basin, where upwelling of warm water is necessary for dense water formation, this should be enhanced, but it also facilitates the inflow of warm water into the Greenland glacial fjords. In all components of the climate system, large uncertainties remain because of the lack of direct observations and the lack of continuous time series in the atmosphere, ice, and ocean.
- Preprint
(6482 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 07 Nov 2026)
- RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-3855', Anonymous Referee #1, 20 Oct 2026 reply
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-3855', Anonymous Referee #2, 01 Nov 2026
reply
Review of Heuze et al. “Review article: Arctic polynyas in a changing climate” submitted to The Cryosphere.
Most of this manuscript is a review of the literature, which I suppose is in keeping with a review article. There is some new research, namely Figure 4 which presents interesting regional relationships between polynya areas and sea ice production. For me, the manuscript seems overly long. There’s a lot of background material that is not directly relevant and if it were cut, in my opinion the paper would be more readable. I would suggest focusing mostly on polynyas and less on “what’s happening in general with air, ice, and ocean.” I also suggest running the text through a word editor (AI or human) owing to the presence of grammar (and some spelling) errors.
As an example of my first suggestion, I would cut most of the first section. Just start right in with What is a Polynya? The background material in this first section is mostly not directly relevant and just adds unnecessary length to this manuscript. E.G., if you want to note that the atmosphere is getting wetter when you discuss specific results, you can do that later in the manuscript.
I was intrigued by Figure 4 and would love to see more analysis of this topic. The review material was fine but not nearly as interesting to me.
Further comments:
Some examples of grammar/spelling problems from the Abstract:
“Its atmosphere is warming 3-4 times the global average” -> Its atmosphere is warming at a rate that is 3-4 times that of the global average … or -> Its atmosphere is warming 3-4 times faster than the global average.
“Its atmosphere is warming 3-4 times the global average; the ocean is warming through increased advection of heat from the Atlantic and Pacific; the sea ice cover is disappearing, thinning, and becoming more mobile.” This is three sentences separated by two semicolons. I don’t think this is proper English.
“focussing” -> focusing
“How this will impact the low altitude clouds, generated by polynyas and that help maintain polynyas, has not been studied.” Awkward phrasing.
“In the ocean’s Eurasian basin” -> In the Arctic Ocean’s Eurasian Basin
“process studies suggest a conflict between this switch to hybrid polynyas (suppressing dense water formation) and Atlantification (favouring it).” I have trouble understanding this.
Beyond the Abstract:
Lines 20-21: “As polynyas provide a window of light into the ice-covered ocean, a breathing hole, and are often associated…” The “and are often” is not a noun like the first two “things that polynyas provide” and is thus poor grammar.
Line 22: “as” -> as a
Line 141: “What a polynya is” -> What is a polynya? Or Definition of a polynya
Line 200: “rely” -> relied
Line 207: “waters” -> water
Line 208: “Taking the advantage” -> Taking advantage
Further grammar issues can be addressed by AI/human.
Other comments follow:
Introduction: The first and final paragraphs have value for this polynya review; I’d cut the rest.
Line 149: Do polynyas by definition have to be recurrent? If yes, why? Do they have to be predictable? Perhaps a more thorough definition of a polynya would be useful in the Introduction.
Line 163: Is Whalers Bay a polynya? I thought a polynya is always bounded by land and/or ice; WB is open to the west/southwest toward Fram Strait. Again perhaps this is an opportunity for a more complete definition of a polynya in the Introduction?
Lines 165-166: I have read Wong et al. 2026 and do not see a discussion of a recent transition from latent to hybrid polynyas.
Line 166: Is this transition discussed in Section 4 as you write? I think instead it’s in Section 5.2, where Figure 4 is referenced.
Line 225: Perhaps the Introduction could have an introduction to the seasonality of polynyas. They appear mostly in winter but sometimes also in spring or summer like the one north of Greenland.
Lines 249-260: This material (and its associated Figure 3) is interesting and I’d be interested to see some quantitative analysis in this regard, eg how (quantitatively) the different data sets complement each other.
Line 583: Why do you put Greenland in a discussion of the Amerasian Basin?
Line 588: Again, I do not see a discussion of a transition to hybrid polynyas in Wong et al. 2026.
Acknowledgements: Only three authors cite their funding sources. Why?
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-3855-RC2
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 384 | 272 | 48 | 704 | 52 | 42 |
- HTML: 384
- PDF: 272
- XML: 48
- Total: 704
- BibTeX: 52
- EndNote: 42
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
Please find my referee comment attached (pdf).