Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-3840
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-3840
20 Jul 2026
 | 20 Jul 2026

Eddy covariance diverges from inventory and model-based estimates of soil organic carbon stock change across five crop rotations in Belgian cropland

Quentin Beauclaire, Bernard Longdoz, Laura Delhez, Bruna Winck, Benjamin Loubet, Yue Zhou, Marmar Sabetizade, Neo Arquin, Nicolas Saby, and Bernard Heinesch

Abstract. Quantifying long-term soil organic carbon (SOC) dynamics in croplands is critical to evaluate their climate mitigation potential. We assessed SOC stock changes over 21 years at the BE-Lon ICOS cropland (Belgium) by comparing decadal soil inventories, RothC model simulations, and eddy covariance (EC) flux measurements, supported by comprehensive uncertainty propagation. Soil inventories and RothC indicated near-equilibrium SOC stock dynamics, with a non-significant loss and a gain of 19.7 ± 30.3 gC m⁻² yr⁻¹, respectively. In contrast, EC-derived carbon budgets suggested mean annual SOC losses of 69.8 ± 19.2 gC m⁻² yr⁻¹. Uncertainty in the flux-based approach was distributed evenly among spectral corrections, friction velocity thresholds, and lateral carbon flux estimates; yet it remained substantially smaller than the cumulative flux signal. A systematic positive discrepancy between EC-derived budget and RothC simulations suggests an underestimation of net carbon sequestration by the EC technique, which is consistent with the well-documented energy balance non-closure at cropland sites. Despite these methodological discrepancies, both EC and RothC consistently highlighted the critical role of management practices. Notably, both approaches identified the winter wheat–cover crop sequence as a moderate net carbon source in the absence of organic amendments. Conversely, manure application emerged as the primary driver of SOC stock accumulation. More broadly, this study highlights the necessity of combining process-based models, multi-decadal inventories, and EC flux measurements to reliably constrain SOC budgets and identify robust management drivers in cropland ecosystems.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share

Journal article(s) based on this preprint

21 Oct 2026
Eddy covariance diverges from inventory and model-based estimates of soil organic carbon stock change across five crop rotations in Belgian cropland
Quentin Beauclaire, Bernard Longdoz, Laura Delhez, Bruna Winck, Benjamin Loubet, Yue Zhou, Marmar Sabetizade, Neo Arquin, Nicolas Saby, and Bernard Heinesch
Biogeosciences, 23, 7345–7374, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-23-7345-2026,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-23-7345-2026, 2026
Short summary
Quentin Beauclaire, Bernard Longdoz, Laura Delhez, Bruna Winck, Benjamin Loubet, Yue Zhou, Marmar Sabetizade, Neo Arquin, Nicolas Saby, and Bernard Heinesch

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-3840', Anonymous Referee #1, 03 Sep 2026
    • AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Quentin Beauclaire, 25 Sep 2026
  • RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-3840', Anonymous Referee #1, 03 Sep 2026
    • AC3: 'Reply on RC2', Quentin Beauclaire, 25 Sep 2026
  • RC3: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-3840', Anonymous Referee #2, 07 Sep 2026
    • AC2: 'Reply on RC3', Quentin Beauclaire, 25 Sep 2026

Peer review completion

AR – Author's response | RR – Referee report | ED – Editor decision | EF – Editorial file upload
ED: Submit a revised manuscript (28 Sep 2026) by Julia Drewer
AR by Quentin Beauclaire on behalf of the Authors (28 Sep 2026)  Author's response   Author's tracked changes   Manuscript 
ED: Publish as is (29 Sep 2026) by Julia Drewer
AR by Quentin Beauclaire on behalf of the Authors (30 Sep 2026)  Manuscript 

Post-review adjustments

AA – Author's adjustment | EA – Editor approval
AA by Quentin Beauclaire on behalf of the Authors (13 Oct 2026)   Author's adjustment   Manuscript
EA: Adjustments approved (13 Oct 2026) by Julia Drewer
AA by Quentin Beauclaire on behalf of the Authors (14 Oct 2026)   Author's adjustment   Manuscript
EA: Adjustments approved (14 Oct 2026) by Julia Drewer

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-3840', Anonymous Referee #1, 03 Sep 2026
    • AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Quentin Beauclaire, 25 Sep 2026
  • RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-3840', Anonymous Referee #1, 03 Sep 2026
    • AC3: 'Reply on RC2', Quentin Beauclaire, 25 Sep 2026
  • RC3: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-3840', Anonymous Referee #2, 07 Sep 2026
    • AC2: 'Reply on RC3', Quentin Beauclaire, 25 Sep 2026

Peer review completion

AR – Author's response | RR – Referee report | ED – Editor decision | EF – Editorial file upload
ED: Submit a revised manuscript (28 Sep 2026) by Julia Drewer
AR by Quentin Beauclaire on behalf of the Authors (28 Sep 2026)  Author's response   Author's tracked changes   Manuscript 
ED: Publish as is (29 Sep 2026) by Julia Drewer
AR by Quentin Beauclaire on behalf of the Authors (30 Sep 2026)  Manuscript 

Post-review adjustments

AA – Author's adjustment | EA – Editor approval
AA by Quentin Beauclaire on behalf of the Authors (13 Oct 2026)   Author's adjustment   Manuscript
EA: Adjustments approved (13 Oct 2026) by Julia Drewer
AA by Quentin Beauclaire on behalf of the Authors (14 Oct 2026)   Author's adjustment   Manuscript
EA: Adjustments approved (14 Oct 2026) by Julia Drewer

Journal article(s) based on this preprint

21 Oct 2026
Eddy covariance diverges from inventory and model-based estimates of soil organic carbon stock change across five crop rotations in Belgian cropland
Quentin Beauclaire, Bernard Longdoz, Laura Delhez, Bruna Winck, Benjamin Loubet, Yue Zhou, Marmar Sabetizade, Neo Arquin, Nicolas Saby, and Bernard Heinesch
Biogeosciences, 23, 7345–7374, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-23-7345-2026,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-23-7345-2026, 2026
Short summary
Quentin Beauclaire, Bernard Longdoz, Laura Delhez, Bruna Winck, Benjamin Loubet, Yue Zhou, Marmar Sabetizade, Neo Arquin, Nicolas Saby, and Bernard Heinesch
Quentin Beauclaire, Bernard Longdoz, Laura Delhez, Bruna Winck, Benjamin Loubet, Yue Zhou, Marmar Sabetizade, Neo Arquin, Nicolas Saby, and Bernard Heinesch

Viewed

Total article views: 623 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
363 193 67 623 88 50 47
  • HTML: 363
  • PDF: 193
  • XML: 67
  • Total: 623
  • Supplement: 88
  • BibTeX: 50
  • EndNote: 47
Views and downloads (calculated since 20 Jul 2026)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 20 Jul 2026)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 582 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 582 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 08 Nov 2026
Download

The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.

Short summary
We studied how soil organic carbon stocks changed over 21 years in a Belgian cropland by combining soil sampling, a soil carbon model, and measurements from a flux tower. The soil appeared mostly stable overall, but the flux-tower approach suggested much larger carbon losses than the other methods. Our results show that using several approaches together is important to better understand soil organic carbon changes and to identify farming practices that either build up or reduce soil carbon.
Share