Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-3803
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-3803
06 Jul 2026
 | 06 Jul 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Biogeosciences (BG).

Quantifying rhizosphere priming effects on soil organic matter decomposition in situ in a subarctic ecotone using natural abundance radiocarbon

Louis A. Mielke, Thomas C. Parker, Lorna E. Street, Karina E. Clemmensen, Nina Lindstrom Friggens, Mark H. Garnett, Iain P. Hartley, David Johnson, Jens-Arne Subke, and Philip A. Wookey

Abstract. Changes in plant-soil interactions associated with shifts in vegetation composition and climate change may have a range of effects on soil microbial activity, including increases (positive priming), inhibition (negative priming), or no net change in organic matter decomposition. The carbon-rich soils, including peats, of high latitude ecosystems, in particular, are at risk of large carbon losses linked to ongoing vegetation shifts, yet their vulnerability to priming in situ remains unresolved. Here we deploy a field-based technique, which harnesses the contemporary atmosphere as a radiocarbon (14C) ‘label’ together with a 14C-depleted (‘ancient’) peat substrate, to quantify soil organic matter (SOM) decomposition in the presence or absence of roots and rhizosphere processes in subarctic Sweden. Collars encased with different mesh sizes were placed in control and girdled (in which belowground carbon transport from the plant canopy was disrupted) mountain birch forest and willow shrub stands to test the hypothesis that the presence of ectomycorrhizal roots and extra-radical mycorrhizal mycelium increases SOM decomposition through positive priming. As expected, carbon dioxide (CO2) and dissolved organic carbon (DOC) from root ingrowth cores were significantly enriched in 14C (contemporary carbon) compared to CO2 and DOC from root exclusion cores (peat carbon), allowing partitioning of carbon mobilisation between heterotrophic (peat substrate) and recent autotrophic (plant) sources. Neither vegetation community (birch or willow), nor girdling treatment, were statistically significant as main effects, but there was a significant rhizosphere priming effect ratio of 1.36 across all groups; thus, the ancient peat-derived CO2 flux was 36 % higher in the presence of a rhizosphere than when it was absent. The lack of a significant girdling effect did not support our specific hypothesis that the presence of ectomycorrhizal roots and their associated mycelium increases SOM decomposition, but the substantial variability of modelled ancient CO2 efflux and DOC concentration during the peak growing season is consistent with the existence of ‘hot-spots’ of microbial activity. Our study provides a potential alternative to artificial substrate (e.g. glucose) additions, or 13C labelling (e.g. pulse-chase), to estimate priming in ecosystems. Furthermore, the study, undertaken in situ in the subarctic, emphasizes that increased primary productivity and associated rhizosphere processes, associated with shifts in vegetation composition and climate change, may not translate simply into increased C sequestration at whole-ecosystem scale.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Louis A. Mielke, Thomas C. Parker, Lorna E. Street, Karina E. Clemmensen, Nina Lindstrom Friggens, Mark H. Garnett, Iain P. Hartley, David Johnson, Jens-Arne Subke, and Philip A. Wookey

Status: open (until 17 Aug 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Louis A. Mielke, Thomas C. Parker, Lorna E. Street, Karina E. Clemmensen, Nina Lindstrom Friggens, Mark H. Garnett, Iain P. Hartley, David Johnson, Jens-Arne Subke, and Philip A. Wookey
Louis A. Mielke, Thomas C. Parker, Lorna E. Street, Karina E. Clemmensen, Nina Lindstrom Friggens, Mark H. Garnett, Iain P. Hartley, David Johnson, Jens-Arne Subke, and Philip A. Wookey
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 07 Jul 2026
Download
Short summary
As the Arctic warms and grows greener, plants should absorb more carbon. But our new study found a contradiction; plant roots and associated organisms actually accelerate the breakdown of ancient peat soils. By tracking carbon in birch and willow ecosystems, we discovered that peat decomposes 36 % faster when roots are present. Instead of storing carbon, 'Arctic greening' could release a massive amount of carbon, accelerating a positive feedback to climate change.
Share