the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Forecasting coastal dune mobility: A logistic regression model driven by meteorological data and climate indices
Abstract. Predicting dune mobility under changing climatic conditions remains a challenge in aeolian geomorphology, particularly in data-scarce regions. This study presents a novel application of binomial logistic regression to forecast dune activation and migration using readily available meteorological data. We combine established dune mobility indices (Tsoar and Lancaster) into a new integrated index (TsoLa) and evaluate its performance against observed dune migration rates derived from satellite imagery. The model incorporates wind speed, precipitation, and the Southern Annular Mode (SAM) as predictors, achieving robust predictive accuracy (AUC > 0.75) for two distinct coastal dune fields in NE Patagonia, Argentina. Our results demonstrate that even with standard climatic inputs, logistic regression can effectively identify periods of dune activity, offering a low-cost tool for coastal management. The approach is transferable to other aeolian systems, providing a framework for assessing dune dynamics under current and future climate scenarios.
- Preprint
(1969 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(41 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (extended)
-
CC1: 'RC Comment on egusphere-2026-377', Graziela Miot da Silva, 31 Mar 2026
reply
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2026/egusphere-2026-377/egusphere-2026-377-CC1-supplement.pdfReplyCitation: https://doi.org/
10.5194/egusphere-2026-377-CC1 -
AC1: 'Reply on CC1', Mauricio Toffani, 07 Apr 2026
reply
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2026/egusphere-2026-377/egusphere-2026-377-AC1-supplement.pdf
-
AC1: 'Reply on CC1', Mauricio Toffani, 07 Apr 2026
reply
-
CC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-377', Thomas Smyth, 27 Apr 2026
reply
Publisher’s note: this comment is a copy of RC1 and its content was therefore removed on 30 April 2026.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-377-CC2 -
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-377', Thomas Smyth, 29 Apr 2026
reply
This is an interesting and relevant study, however, several areas require clarification to improve robustness and reproducibility. More detail is needed on the processing and analysis of aerial imagery (e.g. data sources, spatial resolution, and dune delineation). The manuscript would also benefit from the use of subsection headings to improve structure and readability. Finally, some key concepts and interpretations (e.g. model transferability and the distinction between wind intensity and Resultant Drift Potential) would benefit from clearer definition and supporting evidence.
L21: There is not enough evidence within the article to support the claim that the model is “transferable to other aeolian systems,” particularly as the manuscript concludes by suggesting that future research should test model performance in “diverse climatic and geomorphic settings.” Model transferability typically requires explicit testing, and this statement may therefore be overstated.
L36: A brief explanation of binomial logistic regression would be helpful, as this methodology underpins much of the analysis.
L184 and throughout: The use of subsection headings is recommended to improve readability and overall structure.
L187: Please refer to Figure 1, where the meteorological stations are mapped.
Methods: Further detail is required regarding the processing and analysis of aerial imagery. For example:
- L238: Please clarify which datasets correspond to satellite imagery and what is included under “aerial” data.
- L239: How was the spatial resolution of the Google Earth imagery defined or estimated?
- L238: Was migration assessed only for unvegetated dunes? How were dune areas delineated? Further detail would improve clarity and reproducibility.
- L245: How was a “dune front” defined? An illustrative figure showing how dune fronts were identified and how migration rates were calculated would greatly assist the reader in understanding and reproducing the methodology.
L309: Please provide a reference for these “established” procedures.
L356 to Table 2: A brief reintroduction of TsoLa would be helpful here, as it was last defined in L237.
Figures 9 and 10: Please clarify what values of 0 and 1 represent in the classification, particularly as the term “classification” is not clearly introduced in the Methods.
L458: No results relating to vegetation change or landscape “greening” are presented. Additional evidence or justification would be helpful to support this statement.
L462: A fuller description of the “worm-like” dunes is needed. An illustrative figure would also help the reader interpret and apply this concept to other sites.
L462–L464: Sand supply does not appear to have been included in the analysis. Additional evidence or justification would be helpful to support this interpretation.
L463–L464: The distinction between “wind intensity” and Resultant Drift Potential (RDP) would benefit from further clarification. As RDP inherently incorporates wind speed (i.e. intensity) alongside directional variability, treating “wind intensity” as a separate control introduces some ambiguity. It would be helpful to clarify whether this refers to aspects of the wind regime not captured by RDP or reflects overlap between these terms.
L466–L468: It may be helpful to frame this discussion in the context of Haim Tsoar (2005), who describes physical–biological interactions in dune systems using the concept of hysteresis, whereby dunes become stabilised when wind power is sufficiently low.
Tsoar, H. (2005). Sand dunes mobility and stability in relation to climate. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 357(1), 50-56.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-377-RC1
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 230 | 98 | 25 | 353 | 33 | 15 | 27 |
- HTML: 230
- PDF: 98
- XML: 25
- Total: 353
- Supplement: 33
- BibTeX: 15
- EndNote: 27
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1