the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Comparative Nitrogen Speciation in Marine and Coastal Urban Aerosols of the Greater Bay Area and Ecosystem Implications
Abstract. We present a summer 2024 comparative study of aerosol nitrogen speciation across the Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macau Greater Bay Area (GBA), contrasting marine air over the coastal ocean with a coastal urban site in Hong Kong. Inorganic nitrogen (IN) and organic nitrogen (ON) were quantified, and a high-resolution time-of-flight aerosol mass spectrometer was operated offline to characterize water-soluble nitrogen-containing organics. Total nitrogen and IN showed a west-to-east increase along the coastal ocean, indicating stronger anthropogenic influence in the more populated eastern GBA. ON showed a contrasting pattern: while its concentration decreased offshore, its fraction in total nitrogen peaked in the western marine region (34.6 ± 12.4 %), highlighting the relative importance of ON under lower PM2.5 loadings. Urban aerosols were enriched in ammonium and exhibited more oxidized ON signatures, including higher NO+/NO2+ ratios (7.9 ± 2.6), consistent with NOx–VOC photochemistry. Marine aerosols showed lower NO+/NO2+ ratios (5.3 ± 1.3) and molecular signatures consistent with reduced, amine-related ON, reflecting marine biogenic inputs in the marine boundary layer. Using an inferential approach with deposition velocity (Vd) assumptions, PM2.5-bound nitrogen deposition over the ocean was estimated to be comparable to that at the urban site (0.14 vs. 0.15 kg N ha−1 yr−1), indicating non-negligible fine-particle nitrogen input to adjacent coastal waters. These results demonstrate a notable coastal transition in nitrogen chemical form and suggest that ON speciation should be considered when assessing nitrogen deposition to coastal waters and potential ecosystem responses in the South China Sea.
- Preprint
(2353 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(2519 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 18 Aug 2026)
- RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-3750', Anonymous Referee #1, 08 Aug 2026 reply
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 101 | 61 | 18 | 180 | 36 | 19 | 13 |
- HTML: 101
- PDF: 61
- XML: 18
- Total: 180
- Supplement: 36
- BibTeX: 19
- EndNote: 13
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
This manuscript analyzed the spatial distribution of IN and ON over the Greater Bay Area and found differences in ON composition between urban and marine aerosols. The results are important to estimate nitrogen deposition and its impacts on ecosystems in coastal areas. However, the following comments need to be addressed before publication:
Lines 107-108: This study collected the data of biogeochemical oceanographic measurements. For the discussion on ecosystem implications, I may suggest the authors to combine seawater Chl-a and analyze the potential impacts of aerosol ON input to marine ecosystems.
Lines 147-151: The ship-exhaust influenced samples exhibited higher TC concentrations than clean marine samples. How about the EC concentrations in the PM2.5 samples with and without ship-exhaust influence? Did you observe any other difference in aerosol components between clean samples vs ship-exhaust influenced samples?
Lines 252-253: Please describe how to calculate the offshore distance? Some sampling locations are very close to the shore and surrounded by the continent on three sides?
Lines 266-269: I may suggest adding the back trajectories of air masses to address the influence of anthropogenic pollutants on the sampling location.
Lines 271-274: The spatial distribution of sulfate is confusing. Please describe the distribution of sulfate aerosols using the observed data or add a figure to describe it. Why is sulfate shaped more by regional background transport and the marine boundary layer? The authors need to elaborate the reasons more clearly.
Lines 279-281: The ratios did not vary a lot. In my view, the difference (34.6% vs. 32% vs. 27%) may not be significant. Is the ON contribution significantly different between the three regions? How about the significance level of their difference?
Lines 344-357: The variation of ON and IN during the typhoon period is interesting, but more explanations are needed. Why only NH4-N increased, but there were not obvious variations for the concentrations of NO3-N or ON?
The authors attributed the higher NH4-N during the typhoon period to the transport of continental/inland air masses. However, some air masses on 26 July were from the ocean. Why did the continental air masses not lead to higher ON or nitrate during the typhoon period?
Why continental air masses lead to enhanced particulate NHx through gas-to-particle partitioning? More evidence is needed. Are there any other possibilities?
In addition, back trajectories of air masses on 24 July (in yellow) in Figure 4 are difficult to read. Please change the color.
The authors emphasized “Ecosystem Implications” in the title and calculated aerosol nitrogen deposition in Section 3.4. To what extent would these aerosol nitrogen depositions impact the marine ecosystem of the Greater Bay Area?
And how about the levels of nitrogen nutrients in coastal seawater of the Greater Bay Area? If the waters are eutrophic, aerosol nitrogen deposition may not have an obvious influence on the marine ecosystem in this area.