Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-375
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-375
29 Jan 2026
 | 29 Jan 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences (NHESS).

Towards automated identification of mass movements in spaceborne interferograms: Comparing expert mapping and deep learning approaches

Gwendolyn Dasser, Alessandro Maissen, Michele Volpi, Jordan Aaron, Florian Denzinger, Hugo Raetzo, and Andrea Manconi

Abstract. We compare the performance of domain experts and deep learning algorithms in mapping mass movements in alpine scenarios by relying on Sentinel-1 wrapped phase interferograms. First, statistical assessment suggest that same mass movements are not consistently delineated, with generally low intersection over union (IoU) values (0.210.41), reflecting the difficulty of consistently distinguishing between active/inactive and coherent/incoherent phase patterns. Second, we tested deep learning (DL) architectures and strategies trained on >1000 manually mapped coherent phase patterns to identify the best-performing model. Among the tested DL models, U-Net++ with a ResNet-18 encoder and specific optimisations herein developed, achieved the highest performance. We found an IoU of 0.61 relative to the training labels and, when compared in the ten selected case-studies, DL fell within the range of inter-expert variability (mean IoU of 0.494±0.045, Dice coefficient of 0.661±0.041). Our results show that optimised DL approaches allow detecting mass-movement-related patterns in Sentinel-1 interferograms achieving performances in the same range or higher than domain-experts. DL can provide a substantial reduction in manual mapping efforts, consequently achieving higher levels of standardisation, homogeneity and reliability in the generation of mass movement catalogues based on radar interferograms.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Gwendolyn Dasser, Alessandro Maissen, Michele Volpi, Jordan Aaron, Florian Denzinger, Hugo Raetzo, and Andrea Manconi

Status: open (until 12 Mar 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Gwendolyn Dasser, Alessandro Maissen, Michele Volpi, Jordan Aaron, Florian Denzinger, Hugo Raetzo, and Andrea Manconi
Gwendolyn Dasser, Alessandro Maissen, Michele Volpi, Jordan Aaron, Florian Denzinger, Hugo Raetzo, and Andrea Manconi

Viewed

Total article views: 55 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
43 11 1 55 1 0
  • HTML: 43
  • PDF: 11
  • XML: 1
  • Total: 55
  • BibTeX: 1
  • EndNote: 0
Views and downloads (calculated since 29 Jan 2026)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 29 Jan 2026)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 55 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 55 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 30 Jan 2026
Download
Short summary
We aim to improve early landslide detection and monitoring by automating signal segmentation of Sentinel-1 radar interferograms. We first compared how different experts map mass-movement related signals on interferograms using ten case studies, identifying dataset uncertainties and limitations. We then trained and evaluated deep learning approaches to perform segmentation. Finally showing that models can achieve results comparable to expert variability while improving efficiency.
Share