Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-3737
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-3737
28 Aug 2026
 | 28 Aug 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).

The Cloud-Aerosol Transition Zone Derived from Ground-Based and Satellite Lidars

Jaume Ruiz de Morales, Josep Calbó, Josep-Abel González, Hendrik Andersen, Jan Cermak, Julia Fuchs, Yolanda Sola, and José Luis Gómez-Amo

Abstract. The contribution of Aerosol-Cloud Interactions (ACI) to the Earth’s radiative budget remains a major source of uncertainty in future climate projections. Clouds continuously interact with the surrounding non-saturated environment, forming cloud-aerosol transition zones (TZs). The suspensions in these regions are not fully assessed by cloud-cloudless distinction methodologies and have a non-negligible role in the Earth’s radiative budget, making the lack of large-scale TZ observations a challenge for full comprehension of the climate system. This study assesses TZ distributions using ground-based and spaceborne lidar observations to improve understanding of TZ conditions and evaluate the respective instrument capabilities. Ground-based Automatic low-power Lidars and Ceilometers (ALC) located at Burjassot (Spain), Gruenow (Germany), Girona (Spain) and the Cloudnet network are used, along with CALIOP observations over the region between 30°–80° N and 10° W–35° E, covering Europe. Results show that cloud-to-clear transitions are gradual, depend on detection thresholds and local climatology. Coincidental ALC and CALIOP observations are presented to assess the potential complementarity between the methods. Overall, ground-based ALCs provide high temporal and vertical resolution and are particularly effective at detecting TZs at low altitudes. In contrast, CALIOP offers global coverage and is especially useful for detecting TZs at high altitudes. Both methods show good agreement for cloud classification. However, there are some differences for aerosol and TZ detections due to instrument capabilities, altitude sensitivity, and the classification techniques. Although each approach has its individual limitations, integrating spaceborne downward-looking and ground-based upward-looking lidar observations provides a more comprehensive characterization of cloud-TZ-aerosol distribution.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Jaume Ruiz de Morales, Josep Calbó, Josep-Abel González, Hendrik Andersen, Jan Cermak, Julia Fuchs, Yolanda Sola, and José Luis Gómez-Amo

Status: open (until 09 Oct 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Jaume Ruiz de Morales, Josep Calbó, Josep-Abel González, Hendrik Andersen, Jan Cermak, Julia Fuchs, Yolanda Sola, and José Luis Gómez-Amo
Jaume Ruiz de Morales, Josep Calbó, Josep-Abel González, Hendrik Andersen, Jan Cermak, Julia Fuchs, Yolanda Sola, and José Luis Gómez-Amo
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 28 Aug 2026
Download
Short summary
This study presents cloud–aerosol transition zone distributions from coincidental ground-based and satellite lidar observations. The aim is to evaluate the capabilities of both observing systems and improve knowledge of transition zones, including their occurrence, horizontal extent, and vertical distribution. The results show how integrating both methods can compensate for their individual limitations and provide a more comprehensive characterization of cloud-TZ-aerosol distribution.
Share