Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-3733
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-3733
27 Jul 2026
 | 27 Jul 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).

Evaluation of subseasonal sea ice changes in the Community Earth System Model version two

Madeline Frank and Steven M. Cavallo

Abstract. Forecasting Arctic sea ice is a complex, open problem in polar science, exacerbated by climate change and Arctic amplification. Arctic sea ice dynamics are inherently interconnected to atmosphere and ocean dynamics. This means that coupled climate models are currently the best available tools to model and forecast sea ice. However, climate models consistently underrepresent sea ice processes on subseasonal timescales, contributing to forecasting challenges. In this study, we evaluate the Community Earth System Model Version Two's (CESM2) skill in representing Arctic sea ice by comparing model output to reanalysis and observational data. Doing so establishes CESM2's viability as a tool for studying Arctic sea ice processes and identifies places where model improvements are needed. While sea ice processes in CESM2 have been evaluated on annual and climate timescales, its performance on subseasonal timescales has not. We analyze CESM2's performance in representing subseasonal sea ice variability by comparing its temporal and spatial interannual variability to observations. We also evaluate CESM2's performance at capturing very rapid sea ice loss events (VRILEs). VRILEs are substantial sea ice loss events that occur on the timescale of days. We find that CESM2 does a poor job of representing VRILEs and has less interannual variability than observations.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Madeline Frank and Steven M. Cavallo

Status: open (until 21 Sep 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Madeline Frank and Steven M. Cavallo
Madeline Frank and Steven M. Cavallo
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 28 Jul 2026
Download
Short summary
The decline in Arctic sea ice has proven difficult to capture with climate models. This may be related to how the models represent subseasonal sea ice processes. Here, we compare shorter timescale sea ice processes in the Community Earth System Model version two (CESM2) to observations. We find that CESM2 tends to miss regional sea ice losses that occur on subseasonal timescales. Identifying this deficit in the climate model may help improve the performance of future iterations of the model.
Share