Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-3698
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-3698
02 Jul 2026
 | 02 Jul 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Measurement Techniques (AMT).

Resolving heterogeneous structure and finite scattering in clouds and precipitation with ultra-high-resolution lidar

Grant J. Kirchhoff, Matthew Hayman, Jeffrey P. Thayer, and Bryce H. Garby

Abstract. Lidar is as a key observational tool for cloud profiling, enabling measurements near and within clouds at finer spatiotemporal resolutions than many other remote sensors. However, most atmospheric lidar retrievals rely on the volume backscatter lidar equation, which treats the received signal as a volumetric average over the sampled particle field. This approximation assumes that the average particle-backscatter behavior within the sample volume is representative of the underlying ensemble mean. This study shows that this condition is well satisfied only in locally homogeneous, high particle-occupancy regimes, which are not always present in clouds. Ultra-high-resolution lidar observations at 11 cm x 70 μs in range and time reveal sparsely populated and inhomogeneous cloud regions that violate these assumptions. These observations motivate a statistical formulation of volume scattering, showing that the classical volume-average interpretation emerges as the homogeneous, high-occupancy limit of finite-particle scattering. The formulation enables an analytic investigation of how cloud microphysical properties and instrument parameters contribute to measurement variability, demonstrating how sparse scattering within the sample volume can weaken the volumetric interpretation. Finally, two retrieval approaches are demonstrated that leverage ultra-high-resolution lidar data to estimate cloud-relevant parameters, including hydrometeor kinematics and photon flux, at the single-hydrometeor scale. This work clarifies the conditional limits of the volumetric approximation in cloud lidar and motivates new lidar designs and retrieval strategies that exploit individual particle-scattering contributions and their statistical nature.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Grant J. Kirchhoff, Matthew Hayman, Jeffrey P. Thayer, and Bryce H. Garby

Status: open (until 22 Aug 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Grant J. Kirchhoff, Matthew Hayman, Jeffrey P. Thayer, and Bryce H. Garby

Data sets

Plotting scripts and processed data for "Resolving heterogeneous structure and finite scattering in clouds and precipitation with ultra-high-resolution lidar" G. Kirchhoff et al. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20753336

Grant J. Kirchhoff, Matthew Hayman, Jeffrey P. Thayer, and Bryce H. Garby

Viewed

Total article views: 84 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
47 28 9 84 7 7
  • HTML: 47
  • PDF: 28
  • XML: 9
  • Total: 84
  • BibTeX: 7
  • EndNote: 7
Views and downloads (calculated since 02 Jul 2026)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 02 Jul 2026)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 59 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 59 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 24 Jul 2026
Download
Short summary
Clouds strongly affect weather and climate, but they are hard to measure because their particles are unevenly spaced across very small scales. We used a laser-based instrument to observe clouds in very fine detail and found that standard averaging methods can miss important small-scale structure. Our results show when these averages are reliable, when they can break down, and how future instruments could use signals from individual droplets and ice particles to improve cloud measurements.
Share