Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-3696
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-3696
02 Jul 2026
 | 02 Jul 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Biogeosciences (BG).

Resolving agroforestry extent with a sub-meter tree map and high-resolution land-use data across Europe and the Sahel

Ouadya Tahiri, Damien Beillouin, Patrice Dumas, Rémi Prudhomme, and David Makowski

Abstract. Global agroforestry maps remain uncertain, partly because agricultural land masks used to identify farmland trees have never been systematically validated against ground-truth data. Existing approaches rely on coarse-resolution land-use products and discrete classifications that poorly capture the continuum of tree–crop integration, directly affecting large-scale estimates of climate mitigation and ecosystem services provided by agroforestry. Here, we present the first systematic evaluation of how different land-use masks affect agroforestry mapping accuracy, combining agricultural land masks derived from three 10-meter land-use/land-cover products with a global sub-meter resolution tree canopy map. Validating each land mask-tree canopy combination against 14,162 georeferenced ground-truth observations that distinguish agroforestry from non-agroforestry trees, we find that the choice of agricultural land mask alone drives a 45-percentage-point shift in accuracy. The ESRI-based mask achieves 77.2 % accuracy, outperforming ESA WorldCover (69 %), Dynamic World (68 %), and the Global Pasture Watch (GPW)- based map (32 %) across all biomes tested. Applying the best-performing combination, we estimate that 86 million hectares of agricultural land in Europe and 36 million hectares in the Sahel host at least 1 % tree cover, with sparse-canopy systems (<10 % tree cover) dominating both regions (32 Mha and 21 Mha, respectively). These estimates diverge sharply from the most cited agroforestry maps, which overestimate agroforestry extent by up to 186 % in Europe and underestimate it by 80 % in the Sahel. Together, these findings demonstrate that both land-use mask selection and tree-detection resolution are major, previously unquantified sources of uncertainty in global agroforestry assessments and call for a shift away from coarse-resolution gridded data toward tree-centric, gradient-based approaches capable of resolving individual trees across the agriculture–forest continuum.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Ouadya Tahiri, Damien Beillouin, Patrice Dumas, Rémi Prudhomme, and David Makowski

Status: open (until 13 Aug 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Ouadya Tahiri, Damien Beillouin, Patrice Dumas, Rémi Prudhomme, and David Makowski

Data sets

Large scale georeferenced point dataset of agroforestry systems from photo-interpretation O. Tahiri et al. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20261860

Ouadya Tahiri, Damien Beillouin, Patrice Dumas, Rémi Prudhomme, and David Makowski
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 02 Jul 2026
Download
Short summary
Agroforestry, integrating trees into farmland, provides socio-economic and environmental benefits, but its global extent remains uncertain. We tested different ways of mapping agroforestry against ground observations. We found that estimates change drastically based on how farmlands are identified. Our results highlight a much more accurate map, showing that existing maps overestimate agroforestry extent by up to 186 % in Europe, while underestimating it by 80 % in the African Sahel region.
Share