Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-3613
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-3613
11 Aug 2026
 | 11 Aug 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for The Cryosphere (TC).

Evaluating Arctic sea ice models using simulated microwave brightness temperatures

André Emil Toft Jensen, Rasmus Tage Tonboe, Hoyeon Shi, Suman Singha, Mads Hvid Ribergaard, Imke Sievers, Marcus Huntemann, Melody Sandells, and Vishnu Nandan

Abstract. Independently evaluating large-scale sea ice models is challenging because direct observations are sparse and many satellite products are assimilated into the models being evaluated. Moreover, commonly used sea ice concentration products provide limited information on interior pack-ice properties such as ice thickness. To address these issues, we present a framework for evaluating sea ice models directly in satellite microwave radiometer brightness temperature (TB) space. The framework uses an observation operator to simulate all AMSR2 channels except 7.3 GHz. The observation operator couples emission and radiative-transfer models of the ocean, sea ice, snow, and atmosphere for non-melting Arctic conditions. To reduce simulation uncertainty, the snow-scattering parametrisation and multi-year ice scattering properties were constrained using field and airborne observations. We introduce a multi-channel evaluation metric and demonstrate its sensitivity to errors in sea ice concentration, ice-type fractions, thickness, snow depth, and surface temperature. Application to two versions of a pan-Arctic sea ice model showed that improvements and degradations in modelled sea ice thickness are captured by the metric. The metric was significantly correlated with improvements in first-year ice fraction (R2 = 0.31) and ice thickness (R2 = 0.14), but not with snow depth or surface temperature. These results demonstrate that TB-space evaluation provides a complementary and largely independent approach to sea ice model assessment across both the marginal ice zone and interior pack ice.

Competing interests: At least one of the (co-)authors is a member of the editorial board of The Cryosphere.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
André Emil Toft Jensen, Rasmus Tage Tonboe, Hoyeon Shi, Suman Singha, Mads Hvid Ribergaard, Imke Sievers, Marcus Huntemann, Melody Sandells, and Vishnu Nandan

Status: open (until 22 Sep 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
André Emil Toft Jensen, Rasmus Tage Tonboe, Hoyeon Shi, Suman Singha, Mads Hvid Ribergaard, Imke Sievers, Marcus Huntemann, Melody Sandells, and Vishnu Nandan
André Emil Toft Jensen, Rasmus Tage Tonboe, Hoyeon Shi, Suman Singha, Mads Hvid Ribergaard, Imke Sievers, Marcus Huntemann, Melody Sandells, and Vishnu Nandan
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 11 Aug 2026
Download
Short summary
Sea ice models are essential for understanding climate change, but evaluating them across the Arctic is challenging. We developed a method that compares model simulations directly with satellite measurements of microwave radiation. The resulting performance metric reflects the overall state of the sea ice and snow cover and provides a largely independent way to evaluate and improve large-scale sea ice models, helping to increase confidence in future climate studies.
Share