Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-3607
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-3607
30 Jun 2026
 | 30 Jun 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Biogeosciences (BG).

Biogeochemistry of methane in Arctic waters: A multiyear synthesis (2014–2022) from the North Atlantic-Arctic sector and Barents Sea

Muhammed Fatih Sert, Knut Ola Dølven, Stefan Bünz, Helge Niemann, Giuliana Panieri, Henry Patton, Andreia Plaza-Faverola, Tine L. Rasmussen, Marie Stetzler, Monica Winsborrow, and Bénédicte Ferré

Abstract. Methane seeping from numerous point sources at the seabed represents a biogeochemically constrained carbon source in the water column of the Arctic Ocean. Here, we compile and synthesise water-column data from 28 research cruises conducted between 2014 and 2022 to evaluate the spatial distribution and variability of methane across Arctic seep systems and to assess whether methane enrichment produces detectable changes in water-column biogeochemistry. Our synthesis shows that methane concentrations span five orders of magnitude, ranging from non-detectable levels (<0.52 nM) to 105 nM. Despite this distinct variability, continuous seeping of methane does not measurably alter bulk nutrient regimes, but it influences organic matter cycling through microbial methane oxidation (MOx). In contrast, nutrient and carbon biogeochemistry appear closely associated with seasonal patterns in primary production, showing typical vertical profiles, even in regions of maximum methane flux. This reflects the relatively low abundance of methane compared to other substrates, as nutrients and dissolved organic carbon concentrations remain one to two orders of magnitude higher even at peak methane levels. Consequently, methane-derived carbon constitutes only a minor fraction of total biogeochemical pools, constraining its effect on nutrient dynamics. However, methane exerts a cumulative influence by altering microbial processes and carbon transformation pathways, even in the absence of detectable changes in bulk nutrient concentrations.

Competing interests: At least one of the (co-)authors is a member of the editorial board of Biogeosciences.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Muhammed Fatih Sert, Knut Ola Dølven, Stefan Bünz, Helge Niemann, Giuliana Panieri, Henry Patton, Andreia Plaza-Faverola, Tine L. Rasmussen, Marie Stetzler, Monica Winsborrow, and Bénédicte Ferré

Status: open (until 11 Aug 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Muhammed Fatih Sert, Knut Ola Dølven, Stefan Bünz, Helge Niemann, Giuliana Panieri, Henry Patton, Andreia Plaza-Faverola, Tine L. Rasmussen, Marie Stetzler, Monica Winsborrow, and Bénédicte Ferré
Muhammed Fatih Sert, Knut Ola Dølven, Stefan Bünz, Helge Niemann, Giuliana Panieri, Henry Patton, Andreia Plaza-Faverola, Tine L. Rasmussen, Marie Stetzler, Monica Winsborrow, and Bénédicte Ferré
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 30 Jun 2026
Download
Short summary
Methane seeps from the Arctic seafloor at many locations, but its effects on seawater are limited. By combining data from 28 research cruises, we found that methane varies greatly across the Arctic seep sites. While methane does not noticeably change overall nutrient and carbon levels, it does influence how microbes process and transform carbon. Seasonal cycles of primary production remain the main driver of ocean chemistry, with methane acting as a persistent influence on marine carbon cycling.
Share