Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-3582
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-3582
10 Jul 2026
 | 10 Jul 2026

Do the same river engineering works cause the same morphological adjustments? Context matters!

Gabrielle Seignemartin, Brice Mourier, Jérémie Riquier, and Hervé Piégay

Abstract. Rivers in the Anthropocene have undergone significant geomorphological changes due to engineering interventions such as channelization and hydroelectric infrastructure. These modifications have disrupted hydrological and sedimentary processes, reducing hydrological connectivity and habitat diversity. Evaluating their impacts is crucial for river management and restoration. We studied four channelized and bypassed sections of the French Rhône River (>60 km; ~13 % of its length). We analyzed spatio-temporal trajectories of channel narrowing and margin terrestrialization using GIS-based analysis of historical maps, aerial photographs, and satellite imagery. Historical hydrosedimentary data, including longitudinal profiles and water-level records, were used to assess the contribution of successive development phases. Beyond qualitative observations, such as the simplification of the river pattern toward a single-thread channel, we quantified the variable contributions of channelization and flow diversion. Active-channel narrowing ranged from −43 % to −17 % following channelization and from −32 % to −17 % following flow diversion. Margin terrestrialization increased by 27–44 % and 41–66 %, respectively. Where channelization had limited effects on terrestrialization, flow diversion played a greater role via water-level changes and reshaping the alluvial mosaic dependent on hydrological gradients. Although bed incision is generally expected to be limited in bypassed reaches, it reached −4.1 m in the most affected section (−5 cm·y⁻¹ during the 20th century), largely due to gravel mining associated with dam construction. This four-site comparison displays that engineering pressures interacted with local hydrosedimentary conditions to produce contrasting, legacy-dependent trajectories. Engineering margins, as ecotonal zones, are key indicators of geomorphic adjustment, documenting the system’s response to successive development phases.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Gabrielle Seignemartin, Brice Mourier, Jérémie Riquier, and Hervé Piégay

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Gabrielle Seignemartin, Brice Mourier, Jérémie Riquier, and Hervé Piégay
Gabrielle Seignemartin, Brice Mourier, Jérémie Riquier, and Hervé Piégay
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 10 Jul 2026
Download
Short summary
Rivers in the Anthropocene have undergone significant geomorphological changes due to engineering interventions such as channelization and hydroelectric infrastructure. The study of the terrestrialization of alluvial margins, through a four-site comparison on the Rhône River, shows that engineering pressures interacted with local hydrosedimentary conditions to produce contrasting, legacy-dependent trajectories. Similar phenomena have also been observed in other large European river systems.
Share