Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-3552
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-3552
24 Jul 2026
 | 24 Jul 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).

Increased horizontal resolution provides limited benefits for simulated Arctic and Antarctic sea ice climatology and recent extremes in a NEMO4-SI3 hierarchy

Benjamin Richaud, Dániel Topál, François Massonnet, Thierry Fichefet, Hugues Goosse, and Antoine Barthélemy

Abstract. We assess the sensitivity of Arctic and Antarctic sea ice simulations to horizontal resolution using an ocean-sea ice NEMO4-SI3 hierarchy at 1°, 1/4° and 1/12° nominal resolutions, but with identical vertical resolution, forced by the ERA5 atmospheric reanalysis. Increased resolution improves selected regional and seasonal features, particularly where ocean circulation strongly controls the sea ice edge. In the Arctic, improvements are modest and mainly occur in the Greenland Sea, where the higher-resolution configurations (1/4° and 1/12°) better represent Atlantic inflow west of Svalbard and reduce the excessive winter ice extent simulated at 1°. In the Antarctic, the response is more widespread. Higher horizontal resolution improves the winter ice edge downstream of major bathymetric features, while the 1/4° configuration also improves austral summer sea ice extent and thickness in the Weddell and Ross Seas. Additionally, the 1/12° configuration enhances vertical mixing with warm subsurface waters, promoting thinner ice and a more poleward ice margin. Overall, across both poles, resolution does not systematically improve sea ice extremes or hemispheric biases and benefits depend strongly on the diagnostic considered.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Benjamin Richaud, Dániel Topál, François Massonnet, Thierry Fichefet, Hugues Goosse, and Antoine Barthélemy

Status: open (until 18 Sep 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Benjamin Richaud, Dániel Topál, François Massonnet, Thierry Fichefet, Hugues Goosse, and Antoine Barthélemy

Data sets

Global Sea Ice and Ocean Fields Simulated with the Model NEMO 4.2.2 - SI3 in Three Configurations of Increasing Horizontal Resolution A. Barthélemy et al. https://doi.org/10.14428/DVN/JSDC8Q

Interactive computing environment

Bnjmnr/eORCA_comparison: NEMO-eORCA-comparison-paper, v1.2.0 D. Topál and B. Richaud https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21508270

Benjamin Richaud, Dániel Topál, François Massonnet, Thierry Fichefet, Hugues Goosse, and Antoine Barthélemy
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 24 Jul 2026
Download
Short summary

How does increased horizontal resolution impact the skills of an ice-ocean numerical model to simulate sea ice in the Arctic and Antarctic? We address this question using the NEMO-SI3 model at three different resolutions. While some regional improvements are noticeable in winter in both Arctic and Antarctic, particularly where the ocean is known to influence sea ice, the overall added benefits of using a higher resolution are not systematic.

Share