the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Improved isoprene emission estimates over the Finnish boreal forest using the MEGANv3.2 model
Abstract. In this study, we present an improved framework for modelling isoprene emissions based on the latest version of the Model of Emissions of Gases and Aerosols from Nature (MEGAN). We use high resolution domain-specific tree cover data, species distributions, and species-specific emission factors, to update isoprene emission factors tailored to the Finnish boreal region. These modifications are implemented in MEGAN and integrated into the WRF-CHIMERE chemistry transport model, enabling a more accurate simulation of biogenic emissions. We perform simulations over three consecutive summer periods for the years 2017, 2018, and 2019. Our results reveal a significant reduction in bias for both isoprene emissions fluxes and concentrations compared to previous versions of MEGAN. We further evaluate a canopy correction model to account for the effects of forest canopy on vertical and horizontal transport of biogenic volatile organic compounds (BVOCs) concentrations. These adjustments additionally reduce the bias in modelled isoprene concentrations. The enhanced representation of isoprene emissions, and the effects of canopy on dispersion processes, both result in overall improvements of SOA formation and transportation, emphasizing the importance of ecosystem-specific modifications in emission models and the inclusion of forest canopy correction in chemical transport models. Our findings highlight the importance of moving beyond broad vegetation categories and incorporating detailed tree species distributions in emission factor calculations, demonstrating that ecosystem-specific adjustments are essential for realistic modelling of biogenic emissions and their impacts on atmospheric chemistry.
Competing interests: At least one of the (co-)authors is a member of the editorial board of Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.
Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.- Preprint
(14752 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(1955 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 27 Mar 2026)
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 150 | 143 | 10 | 303 | 22 | 11 | 10 |
- HTML: 150
- PDF: 143
- XML: 10
- Total: 303
- Supplement: 22
- BibTeX: 11
- EndNote: 10
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1