Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-3481
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-3481
03 Jul 2026
 | 03 Jul 2026

The open uncertainty window in ocean biogeochemical responses to fossil carbon emissions

Karin Kvale, Ivy Frenger, Julia Getzlaff, Wolfgang Koeve, Iris Kriest, Angela Landolfi, and Andreas Oschlies

Abstract. Automated parameter optimisation can effectively reduce model-data mismatch and provide information about ocean biogeochemistry parameter sensitivities, but to what extent it reduces uncertainty in responses to climate change is not well understood. To explore the robustness of simulated ocean biogeochemical responses to a “business-as-usual” RCP 8.5-equivalent fossil CO2 emission scenario until year 2300, six biogeochemical parameters are optimised against contemporary oxygen, phosphate, and nitrate fields in three different physical configurations of the UVic ESCM. The phytoplankton maximum growth rate parameter value and the nitrogen-to-oxygen molar ratio of organic matter remineralisation were found to be robust across the calibration ensemble, with the former varying less than 1.6 % across the calibrated ensemble and the latter varying less than 4 %. While each calibrated model performs nearly equivalently in terms of optimal total misfit (a result of the model calibration objective), significant differences in biogeochemical fluxes and rates (e.g., global net primary and particulate organic carbon; POC) remain. Application of CO2 emissions to the calibrated models to the year 2300 produces model responses that start diverging in global average trends in the early 2000s. Models with more sluggish pre-industrial circulations respond less to climate warming in terms of physical changes, but more in their primary production (as these models have been tuned to have weaker limitation on production). Models that have larger changes in circulation metrics due to anthropogenic CO2 emissions, in particular the Southern Ocean overturning, demonstrate larger changes in shallow (130 m) and deep (2 km) POC fluxes (due to stronger parametric control on particle flux). Suboxic volume trends are smaller in models with larger changes to the physical circulation metrics owing to compensation between model tuning favouring strong biological oxygen consumption in their vigorous pre-industrial state and these models’ having a greater physical sensitivity to warming. By the year 2300, the resulting model responses vary by a factor 2.8 in net primary production, 5 in shallow POC fluxes, 1.7 in deep POC fluxes, 1.5 in nitrogen fixation and 1.2 in suboxic volume, but the model spread in absolute values relative to the pre-industrial remains largely unchanged, demonstrating the utility of constraining the pre-industrial ocean state in diverse model ensembles for robust projections of ocean change. These results demonstrate the potential to reduce, but not to close the open uncertainty window in ocean biogeochemical responses to CO2 emissions.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share

Journal article(s) based on this preprint

30 Oct 2026
The open uncertainty window in ocean biogeochemical responses to fossil carbon emissions
Karin Kvale, Ivy Frenger, Julia Getzlaff, Wolfgang Koeve, Iris Kriest, Angela Landolfi, and Andreas Oschlies
Biogeosciences, 23, 7679–7704, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-23-7679-2026,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-23-7679-2026, 2026
Short summary
Karin Kvale, Ivy Frenger, Julia Getzlaff, Wolfgang Koeve, Iris Kriest, Angela Landolfi, and Andreas Oschlies

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-3481', Anonymous Referee #1, 30 Jul 2026
    • AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Karin Kvale, 05 Sep 2026
  • RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-3481', Anonymous Referee #2, 08 Aug 2026
    • AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Karin Kvale, 05 Sep 2026

Peer review completion

AR – Author's response | RR – Referee report | ED – Editor decision | EF – Editorial file upload
ED: Submit a revised manuscript (10 Sep 2026) by Liuqian Yu
AR by Karin Kvale on behalf of the Authors (11 Sep 2026)  Author's response   Author's tracked changes   Manuscript 
ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (14 Sep 2026) by Liuqian Yu
RR by Anonymous Referee #1 (26 Sep 2026)
ED: Publish as is (10 Oct 2026) by Liuqian Yu
AR by Karin Kvale on behalf of the Authors (16 Oct 2026)  Manuscript 

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-3481', Anonymous Referee #1, 30 Jul 2026
    • AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Karin Kvale, 05 Sep 2026
  • RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-3481', Anonymous Referee #2, 08 Aug 2026
    • AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Karin Kvale, 05 Sep 2026

Peer review completion

AR – Author's response | RR – Referee report | ED – Editor decision | EF – Editorial file upload
ED: Submit a revised manuscript (10 Sep 2026) by Liuqian Yu
AR by Karin Kvale on behalf of the Authors (11 Sep 2026)  Author's response   Author's tracked changes   Manuscript 
ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (14 Sep 2026) by Liuqian Yu
RR by Anonymous Referee #1 (26 Sep 2026)
ED: Publish as is (10 Oct 2026) by Liuqian Yu
AR by Karin Kvale on behalf of the Authors (16 Oct 2026)  Manuscript 

Journal article(s) based on this preprint

30 Oct 2026
The open uncertainty window in ocean biogeochemical responses to fossil carbon emissions
Karin Kvale, Ivy Frenger, Julia Getzlaff, Wolfgang Koeve, Iris Kriest, Angela Landolfi, and Andreas Oschlies
Biogeosciences, 23, 7679–7704, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-23-7679-2026,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-23-7679-2026, 2026
Short summary
Karin Kvale, Ivy Frenger, Julia Getzlaff, Wolfgang Koeve, Iris Kriest, Angela Landolfi, and Andreas Oschlies

Data sets

Closing the open uncertainty window in ocean responses to fossil CO2 emissions K. Kvale et al. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12085/a142cc91-2918-43ef-b2e9-0e971ad95f3e

Model code and software

Closing the open uncertainty window in ocean responses to fossil CO2 emissions K. Kvale et al. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12085/a142cc91-2918-43ef-b2e9-0e971ad95f3e

Karin Kvale, Ivy Frenger, Julia Getzlaff, Wolfgang Koeve, Iris Kriest, Angela Landolfi, and Andreas Oschlies

Viewed

Total article views: 481 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
276 150 55 481 56 49
  • HTML: 276
  • PDF: 150
  • XML: 55
  • Total: 481
  • BibTeX: 56
  • EndNote: 49
Views and downloads (calculated since 03 Jul 2026)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 03 Jul 2026)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 423 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 423 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 05 Nov 2026
Download

The requested preprint has a corresponding peer-reviewed final revised paper. You are encouraged to refer to the final revised version.

Short summary
We tried to understand how parameter choices can impact ocean model results over long-timescale simulations. Using a standard ocean biogeochemical model, we modified the physics slightly and then used an objective tuning procedure to create 3 ocean biogeochemical models that perform nearly identically for the modern ocean. These 3 models gave similar results but for different underlying reasons, which caused the models to respond differently when forced with fossil CO2 emissions.
Share