the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
The open uncertainty window in ocean biogeochemical responses to fossil carbon emissions
Abstract. Automated parameter optimisation can effectively reduce model-data mismatch and provide information about ocean biogeochemistry parameter sensitivities, but to what extent it reduces uncertainty in responses to climate change is not well understood. To explore the robustness of simulated ocean biogeochemical responses to a “business-as-usual” RCP 8.5-equivalent fossil CO2 emission scenario until year 2300, six biogeochemical parameters are optimised against contemporary oxygen, phosphate, and nitrate fields in three different physical configurations of the UVic ESCM. The phytoplankton maximum growth rate parameter value and the nitrogen-to-oxygen molar ratio of organic matter remineralisation were found to be robust across the calibration ensemble, with the former varying less than 1.6 % across the calibrated ensemble and the latter varying less than 4 %. While each calibrated model performs nearly equivalently in terms of optimal total misfit (a result of the model calibration objective), significant differences in biogeochemical fluxes and rates (e.g., global net primary and particulate organic carbon; POC) remain. Application of CO2 emissions to the calibrated models to the year 2300 produces model responses that start diverging in global average trends in the early 2000s. Models with more sluggish pre-industrial circulations respond less to climate warming in terms of physical changes, but more in their primary production (as these models have been tuned to have weaker limitation on production). Models that have larger changes in circulation metrics due to anthropogenic CO2 emissions, in particular the Southern Ocean overturning, demonstrate larger changes in shallow (130 m) and deep (2 km) POC fluxes (due to stronger parametric control on particle flux). Suboxic volume trends are smaller in models with larger changes to the physical circulation metrics owing to compensation between model tuning favouring strong biological oxygen consumption in their vigorous pre-industrial state and these models’ having a greater physical sensitivity to warming. By the year 2300, the resulting model responses vary by a factor 2.8 in net primary production, 5 in shallow POC fluxes, 1.7 in deep POC fluxes, 1.5 in nitrogen fixation and 1.2 in suboxic volume, but the model spread in absolute values relative to the pre-industrial remains largely unchanged, demonstrating the utility of constraining the pre-industrial ocean state in diverse model ensembles for robust projections of ocean change. These results demonstrate the potential to reduce, but not to close the open uncertainty window in ocean biogeochemical responses to CO2 emissions.
- Preprint
(5371 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: final response (author comments only)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-3481', Anonymous Referee #1, 30 Jul 2026
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2026/egusphere-2026-3481/egusphere-2026-3481-RC1-supplement.pdfCitation: https://doi.org/
10.5194/egusphere-2026-3481-RC1 -
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-3481', Anonymous Referee #2, 08 Aug 2026
Kvale et al. – The open uncertainty window in ocean biogeochemical responses to fossil carbon emissions.
Summary.
Kvale and colleagues explore how slight variations in how an ocean model is calibrated under pre-industrial or historical conditions can lead to a divergence in the transient response under greenhouse warming.
To do so, they use the UVIC ESM. They set up three independent physical states by using 3 different vertical mixing regimes - BL, TID and CON – which they tune manually so that each is as similar as possible. Similarity is measured in terms of AMOC, AABW, ACC and CDW overturning strengths and these 3 independent physical states are run for 10,000 years. They feed these equilibrated physical circulations into a transport tracer matrix (TTM) and follow a useful method for simultaneous parameter optimisation of 6 key ocean BGC model parameters. Thus, they arrive at 3 different physical and biogeochemical ocean states that nonetheless near-equally represent the ocean and BGC state relative to modern day observations. Following this achievement, the authors then force the ESM with these 3 ocean states with increasing atmospheric CO2 and describe the differences and similarities in the transient response.
The authors find divergent responses in key biogeochemical properties of interest, like net primary production, showing that how we set-up our ocean models can have a real influence on our projections. Their results highlight how even very similar model states tuned to reproduce modern day conditions can result in different projected states in the future and this is a major challenge in our work.
Comments.
The authors do a good job of assessing their model states and addressing biases at each stage of their approach. The paper is well presented and I find no major problems or concerns with it. I have some minor comments below that I hope the authors can address.
Line 149 – sentence needs rephrasing.
Line 297 – the authors state: “All three model configurations retain similar biases in pre-industrial nutrient and carbon distributions in all ocean basins (Fig. 7) despite calibration, which result from shared biases in the general circulation.” Can the authors show this? At present, this statement has no clear evidence behind it and appears to be an assertion. Isn’t it possible that the BGC model, which is simple as far as BGC models go, has an upper ceiling in its process representation that sets a limit to how well the model can represent nutrient and oxygen fields?
Correlation metrics - Isn’t it a bit dishonest to present the correlation statistics when these are actually based on only 3 points? Noting that you’ve done a lot of work to get those three points, I think a different way of presenting this information would be good. Instead of large monotone boxes, couldn’t you have individual panels with the three points and a line, which would be honest about the fact that these correlations are created from 3 points.
Discussion Lines 503 - 518: I was unsure of your point. Consider rephrasing or separating this paragraph into distinct arguments.
Line 520 - I disagree that the parameter optimisation is rigorous if it can only address 6 parameters. Suggest rephrasing.
Line 525 - Which processes? Can you give a concrete example? Without one it becomes too abstract and hard to follow.
The discussion in general feels a bit thin while the results section is overwhelming with detail. Consider re-prioritizing.
Thank you for considering my input to your research.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-3481-RC2
Data sets
Closing the open uncertainty window in ocean responses to fossil CO2 emissions K. Kvale et al. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12085/a142cc91-2918-43ef-b2e9-0e971ad95f3e
Model code and software
Closing the open uncertainty window in ocean responses to fossil CO2 emissions K. Kvale et al. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12085/a142cc91-2918-43ef-b2e9-0e971ad95f3e
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 102 | 55 | 19 | 176 | 13 | 12 |
- HTML: 102
- PDF: 55
- XML: 19
- Total: 176
- BibTeX: 13
- EndNote: 12
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1