Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-3473
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-3473
21 Jul 2026
 | 21 Jul 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for SOIL (SOIL).

Loess Soil Structural Changes Induced by Bio- and Synthetic Polymer Stabilizers: Geoelectrical Insights

Sonya Sara Altzitser, Yael Golda Mishael, and Nimrod Schwartz

Abstract. Traditional assessments of soil aggregate stability rely on destructive, ex situ protocols that fail to capture the continuous evolution of soil architecture. This study evaluates the divergent stabilization trajectories induced by chia seed mucilage (CSM) and anionic polyacrylamide (A-PAM) in loess soil over a 20-day incubation. By integrating Spectral Induced Polarization (SIP) with microbial respiration and tracer breakthrough experiments, we track the transition from initial aggregation to long-term structural outcomes. Results demonstrate that CSM-induced stabilization is strictly transient; rapid microbial degradation of the biopolymer results in progressive reversal of the induced structural modifications and a reversion to baseline hydraulic behaviour. In contrast, A-PAM provides persistent physicochemical reinforcement, establishing a dual-porosity regime characterized by immobile water domains and preferential flow pathways. SIP signatures effectively resolved these dynamics: high-frequency shifts in quadrature conductivity (σ'' ) provided geoelectrical evidence of micro-aggregate formation, while the development of a 'conductive reservoir' in in-phase conductivity (σ' ) identified hydraulically isolated ion accumulation. These findings establish SIP as a high-resolution, non-invasive proxy for monitoring the interplay between biochemical persistence and the mechanical stabilization of soil structure.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Sonya Sara Altzitser, Yael Golda Mishael, and Nimrod Schwartz

Status: open (until 01 Sep 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Sonya Sara Altzitser, Yael Golda Mishael, and Nimrod Schwartz
Sonya Sara Altzitser, Yael Golda Mishael, and Nimrod Schwartz

Viewed

Total article views: 64 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
49 12 3 64 3 2
  • HTML: 49
  • PDF: 12
  • XML: 3
  • Total: 64
  • BibTeX: 3
  • EndNote: 2
Views and downloads (calculated since 21 Jul 2026)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 21 Jul 2026)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 64 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 64 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 23 Jul 2026
Download
Short summary
Soil structure affects erosion resistance and plant growth. This study compared a natural plant derivative and a synthetic polymer as soil stabilizers, using continuous electrical monitoring instead of disruptive sampling. The natural polymer improved soil structure briefly but was quickly degraded by microbes, losing its effect. The synthetic polymer caused lasting changes, including trapped water zones within the soil. This non-invasive monitoring suggests tracking soil changes in real time.
Share