Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-3428
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-3428
29 Jun 2026
 | 29 Jun 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).

Evaluating the EPICC-Model for Regional Air Quality Simulation: A Comparative Study with CAMx and CMAQ

Mengjie Lou, Qizhong Wu, Wending Wang, Huansheng Chen, Kai Cao, Xiaohan Fan, Dingyue Liang, Fen Fen Yu, Jiating Zhang, Wei Wang, and Zifa Wang

Abstract. This study presents a systematic evaluation of China’s independently developed EPICC-Model for regional PM2.5 and MDA8 O3 simulations against established international models, using WRF meteorological fields and a multi-source integrated emission inventory. Results highlight the strengths of the EPICC-Model in several aspects: it achieves relatively high spatial consistency with measurements for PM2.5, with an annual ​​index of agreement (IOA) of 0.80, and accurately captures pollution patterns in heavily polluted North China. It also demonstrates improved performance in simulating summer O3 peaks, reducing maximum biases by more than 20 μg m-3, primarily through enhanced heterogeneous HONO formation and nitrate photolysis pathways that elevate OH concentrations, and it incorporates the CB6r5 mechanism to better represent biogenic VOC oxidation. The model exhibits the highest hit rate (45.6 %) for forecasting moderate PM2.5 and moderate O3 pollution events and successfully reproduces persistent pollution episodes. However, all models share common limitations, including insufficient capability in reproducing heavy pollution episodes, systematic underestimation of SO₄²⁻, and uncertainties in SOA-related OC simulations. Future improvements should focus on refining secondary aerosol chemistry, emission inventories, and boundary layer representations. This study has not only demonstrated the performance of the EPICC-Model against international models but also provides guidance for improving regional and global air quality models.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Mengjie Lou, Qizhong Wu, Wending Wang, Huansheng Chen, Kai Cao, Xiaohan Fan, Dingyue Liang, Fen Fen Yu, Jiating Zhang, Wei Wang, and Zifa Wang

Status: open (until 24 Aug 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Mengjie Lou, Qizhong Wu, Wending Wang, Huansheng Chen, Kai Cao, Xiaohan Fan, Dingyue Liang, Fen Fen Yu, Jiating Zhang, Wei Wang, and Zifa Wang
Mengjie Lou, Qizhong Wu, Wending Wang, Huansheng Chen, Kai Cao, Xiaohan Fan, Dingyue Liang, Fen Fen Yu, Jiating Zhang, Wei Wang, and Zifa Wang
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 29 Jun 2026
Download
Short summary
This study compares the model performance of the Emission and atmospheric Processes Integrated and Coupled Community Model with the two air quality models in China. The EPICC-Model excels in simulating summer ozone peaks, accurately captures pollution characteristics in highly polluted areas, and better reproduces persistent compound pollution processes. The study reveals common issues among the models and directions for improvement, providing a basis for optimizing global air quality models.
Share