the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Stability constraining the radiation-driven convective anvil outflow
Abstract. Anvil clouds outflowing from the convection top interact strongly with radiation. The anvil formation is driven by radiation and simultaneously modulates radiation. Since the convective anvil outflow process has not been well resolved from observations, the hypothesized anvil-radiation feedback processes are lack of adequate evidence to be further refined. In this work, by combining the advantages of geostationary satellites for identifying convection producing anvil clouds and the A-Train polar-orbit satellites for the cross section of the radiation heating the anvil, the real-world convective anvil outflow is resolved to further refine the previously hypothesized process of the radiation driving the anvil outflow. The results show that the destabilization of the longwave radiative cooling at the cloud top only partially explains the anvil outflow dynamics at relatively lower levels, and that the shortwave radiative heating and its destabilization can strongly enhance the outflow at higher levels. Nevertheless, notably, the role of the radiation driving the anvil outflow is strongly constrained by its environmental stability and its vertical gradient. In the vertical, the primary radiation-driven anvil outflow is constrained between the levels of the minimum stability and the maximum stability gradient approximately 12–14 km. Less stable environment or upward-shifting of the minimum stability makes the anvil produced at a higher level. Overall, this work clarifies the process of the anvil outflow driven by radiation but constrained by environmental stability and provides a novel stability constraint on the anvil-radiation feedback.
- Preprint
(3347 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: final response (author comments only)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-3420', Jakob Deutloff, 17 Jul 2026
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2026/egusphere-2026-3420/egusphere-2026-3420-RC1-supplement.pdfCitation: https://doi.org/
10.5194/egusphere-2026-3420-RC1 -
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Zhenquan Wang, 08 Oct 2026
I sincerely appreciate the efforts and insightful comments of Dr. Jakob Deutloff on this manuscript. Your constructive suggestions have greatly improved this work. I have carefully considered all your comments and revised and reorganized the manuscript accordingly. The attached pdf file contains detailed responses to the points raised by the reviewer.
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Zhenquan Wang, 08 Oct 2026
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-3420', Seth Seidel, 07 Aug 2026
Please see attached document for the review comments.
-
RC3: 'Reply on RC2', Seth Seidel, 08 Aug 2026
I believe my first major comment reflected an error on my part, not on the part of the author. I wrote that the traditional FAT type theories tried to constrain outflow only from the convective core rather than the whole core+anvil region. While many of those papers are rather vague about that distinction, one thing is clear: they were only concerned with estimating convergence in strictly clear skies. I think the author may safely neglect the first comment in the review I sent over. I have attached a version without that comment.
I apologize for the mistake. I thought about that comment for several days, and in the end the real problem was something I had misunderstood.
I would add one suggestion: At line 61, open with a sentence stating something similar to, "While FAT, PHAT, and the Stability Iris estimate C to constrain D, we lack a direct estimate of C based only on diabatic processes within the cloudy region itself." Together with the last sentence of the preceding paragraph, it will make for a clearer statement of what problem you're interested in.
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC3', Zhenquan Wang, 08 Oct 2026
Many thanks for insights and efforts of Dr. Seth Sidel in reviewing this manuscript. The author greatly appreciates your very valuable comments that help improve this manuscript. I have carefully considered these comments and revised the manuscript accordingly. The attached pdf file contains detailed responses to the points raised by the reviewer.
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC3', Zhenquan Wang, 08 Oct 2026
-
RC3: 'Reply on RC2', Seth Seidel, 08 Aug 2026
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 121 | 90 | 37 | 248 | 42 | 31 |
- HTML: 121
- PDF: 90
- XML: 37
- Total: 248
- BibTeX: 42
- EndNote: 31
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1