Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-3385
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-3385
09 Jul 2026
 | 09 Jul 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Measurement Techniques (AMT).

Evaluation and application of a convolutional neural network for graupel identification in DCMEX deep convective cloud

Ezri E. Alkilani-Brown, Declan L. Finney, Alan M. Blyth, Paul R. Field, Jonathan Crosier, and Chetan R. Deva

Abstract. Untangling the ice microphysical interactions within deep convective clouds presents an ongoing issue. Cumulonimbus have implications for localised precipitation and global radiative feedbacks. In situ flight campaign data is informative of these interactions and can consolidate our understanding. Identifying ice particle habits illustrates the evolving cloud on the micro-scale. In particular, the development and growth of graupel continues to be the least understood hydrometeor in numerical models. Consequently, in the ever-evolving machine learning landscape, a multitude of instrument and dataset specific ice habit identification algorithms are becoming commonplace. Here, we complete a key step of independently assessing several generalised and open source algorithms, to better understand their suitability for wider uptake. Evaluation and application of generalised convolutional neural networks (CNN), created by Jaffeux et al. (2025) has been undertaken on unseen two-dimensional stereo (2D-S) and High Volume Particle Spectrometer (HVPS) images from the Deep Convective Microphysics EXperiment (DCMEX). Models were not re-tuned to the dataset. Jaffeux et al.'s global CNN tested with human labelled 2D-S images obtained an accuracy of 72 % and F1 score (harmonic mean of precision and recall) of 70 %. While for HVPS images, the HVPS-specific CNN had an accuracy of 86 % and F1 score of 73 %, which was only marginally better than the global model. Then scaling up CNN application to the whole DCMEX dataset, graupel concentrations were inferred from rimed particle classification. The models constructed by Jaffeux et al. (2025) present an accessible, accurate and adjustable approach for particle identification of optical array probe images.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Ezri E. Alkilani-Brown, Declan L. Finney, Alan M. Blyth, Paul R. Field, Jonathan Crosier, and Chetan R. Deva

Status: open (until 14 Aug 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Ezri E. Alkilani-Brown, Declan L. Finney, Alan M. Blyth, Paul R. Field, Jonathan Crosier, and Chetan R. Deva

Data sets

DCMEX 2D-S and HVPS labelled images for CNN evaluation Ezri Alkilani-Brown, Declan Finney, Alan Blyth, and Paul Field https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20612982

Ezri E. Alkilani-Brown, Declan L. Finney, Alan M. Blyth, Paul R. Field, Jonathan Crosier, and Chetan R. Deva
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 09 Jul 2026
Download
Short summary
Graupel continues to be one of the most poorly characterised ice particles in deep convective clouds. In situ images are critical for understanding its microphysical development. Consequently, a plethora of independent classification schemes has become commonplace. Here, an independent evaluation of several open-source algorithms was undertaken to assess if they are generalisable. Classifications were then applied to the entire DCMEX campaign, to infer graupel concentrations.
Share