Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-3352
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-3352
07 Jul 2026
 | 07 Jul 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Climate of the Past (CP).

Development and comparison of documentary-instrumental and circulation-based multi-centennial precipitation reconstructions for Dublin, Ireland

Csaba Horvath, Conor Murphy, and Ciara Ryan

Abstract. This study develops a multi-centennial reconstruction of precipitation for the Greater Dublin Area, Ireland, using documentary, instrumental, circulation-based, and proxy evidence. Three independent reconstructions are produced for two contrasting water-resource domains, including: a monthly scaled version of the Jenkinson documentary-instrumental rainfall dataset for 1711–1977 produced by an earlier analysis for the island of Ireland; a circulation-informed monthly statistical ensemble based on Lasso and Random Forest models for 1748–1994; and an annual oak cellulose δ¹⁸O reconstruction of May–August precipitation extending to 1200 CE. Reconstructions were assessed against 1 km gridded rainfall observations for the common overlap period 1865–1977 using correlation, bias, error metrics, SPI-based event detection, and agreement in ranked wet and dry extremes. Long-term UK rainfall series and an extended Dublin snow and sleet series were used as independent comparators. Both the Jenkinson and statistical ensemble reconstructions reproduce observed monthly, seasonal, and annual rainfall variability, but the Jenkinson reconstruction shows the strongest agreement across most metrics and better captures wet and dry extremes. The statistical ensemble provides an independent, physically interpretable reconstruction, although it tends to smooth variability and under-represent event magnitude. The δ¹⁸O reconstruction shows weaker interannual agreement with observed May–August rainfall but provides a valuable longer-term perspective on summer hydroclimatic variability. Divergence between the Jenkinson and ensemble reconstructions before the mid-nineteenth century, particularly in winter and spring, is consistent with possible snow- and sleet-related undercatch in early precipitation sources which affects the Jenkinson reconstruction. Summer rainfall during the eighteenth century remains uncertain, with evidence for increased regional hydroclimatic heterogeneity. Together, these reconstructions provide a stronger basis for contextualising historical droughts and pluvials affecting Dublin and for stress-testing water-resource systems beyond the instrumental period.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Csaba Horvath, Conor Murphy, and Ciara Ryan

Status: open (until 01 Sep 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Csaba Horvath, Conor Murphy, and Ciara Ryan

Data sets

Multi-centennial Rainfall Reconstructions for the Greater Dublin Area, Ireland Version: 1.0 C. Horvath et al. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20605304

Csaba Horvath, Conor Murphy, and Ciara Ryan
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 07 Jul 2026
Download
Short summary
Reliable rainfall records are often too short to capture the full range of natural climate variability. This study combined old weather records, early rainfall measurements, tree-ring evidence, and modern machine learning methods to reconstruct more than three centuries of rainfall in the Dublin region. Historical records gave the closest match to observations. The results provide a longer view of past droughts and wet periods and support better water planning in a changing climate.
Share