Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-3338
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-3338
05 Aug 2026
 | 05 Aug 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).

Radiocarbon-based source apportionment of carbonaceous aerosols over the Athabasca Oil Sands Region in Alberta, Canada

Lurui Niu, Xiaomei Xu, Elizabeth Wiggins, James Randerson, Allison Welch, Guaciara Santos, Rebecca Sheesley, Claire Moffett, and Claudia Czimczik

Abstract. The Athabasca Oil Sands Region (AOSR) hosts one of the world's largest unconventional fossil fuel operations, producing a complex carbonaceous aerosol mixture: fossil emissions from oil sands operations, biogenic secondary organic aerosol (SOA) from surrounding boreal landscapes, and episodic wildfire emissions, with consequences for regional air quality and climate. Here, we present a first dual-isotope (14C/δ13C) source apportionment of total carbon (TC) and elemental carbon (EC) in PM2.5 collected at Fort McKay from May to October 2017. Sampling-day PM2.5 ranged 0.8–20.3 µg m-3 (mean 6.9 ± 4.7, n = 29), versus 0.2–38.1 µg m-3 in the continuous record, indicating that filter sampling did not capture the highest pollution episodes. TC and organic carbon (OC) correlated strongly (Spearman ρ = 0.89) and positively with temperature (ρ = 0.67), consistent with biogenic SOA. EC co-varied with NO2 (ρ = 0.77) and SO2 (ρ = 0.51), implicating diesel mining fleets and upgrader stacks. During smoke-free periods, fossil fuel combustion dominated TC (mean: 51 %, range: 26–77 %), with westerly air masses crossing active mining areas more 14C-depleted (F14C = 0.58 ± 0.22) than northerly masses (F14C = 0.63 ± 0.14). During wildfire-impacted periods, biomass burning was the dominant source (fbb mean: 45 %, range: 9–76 %). The AOSR exhibited substantially lower summertime F14C values than Arctic and boreal comparison sites during non-fire periods, reflecting persistent local fossil fuel influence. These results provide information that can contribute to an isotopic baseline for emission inventories, atmospheric models, and air quality management in the AOSR.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Lurui Niu, Xiaomei Xu, Elizabeth Wiggins, James Randerson, Allison Welch, Guaciara Santos, Rebecca Sheesley, Claire Moffett, and Claudia Czimczik

Status: open (until 16 Sep 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Lurui Niu, Xiaomei Xu, Elizabeth Wiggins, James Randerson, Allison Welch, Guaciara Santos, Rebecca Sheesley, Claire Moffett, and Claudia Czimczik
Lurui Niu, Xiaomei Xu, Elizabeth Wiggins, James Randerson, Allison Welch, Guaciara Santos, Rebecca Sheesley, Claire Moffett, and Claudia Czimczik
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 05 Aug 2026
Download
Short summary
The Athabasca oil sands are a major source of PM2.5 from mining, upgrading, and diesel fleets. Summer emissions mix with wildfire smoke and boreal biogenic aerosols, complicating source attribution. We measured PM2.5 isotopes at Fort McKay in 2017 and found fossil fuel combustion dominated smoke-free periods, while biomass burning dominated smoke events. A persistent fossil carbon signature distinguished the region from remote Arctic and boreal sites.
Share