Modelling dynamic coastal vegetation establishment and ecosystem engineering in hydro-morphodynamic models with DYCOVE
Abstract. Coastal areas are complex environments with diverse hydrodynamic, morphological, sedimentological, and biological contexts. Vegetation is increasingly recognized as a crucial agent that shapes the geomorphology and hydrology of coastal and riverine systems by inducing a hydraulic roughness that influences flow velocities, inundation, erosion, and deposition. At the same time, vegetation growth depends on the environmental habitat conditions, which it modifies continuously, resulting in a biophysical feedback-loop. This loop between plant growth and the physical environment is inherently dynamic, meaning they both vary spatiotemporally through their interactions; however, these dynamics are currently excluded from most hydro-morphodynamic models that predict long-term coastal change. We present the DYnamic COastal VEgetation model DYCOVE: an open-source, process-based vegetation model that simulates dynamic coastal marsh vegetation by representing key ecological processes such as seed dispersal, establishment criteria, growth curves, and mortality rules. Vegetation dynamics are governed by species-specific thresholds for inundation, desiccation, bed level change, and flow conditions while age-dependent stress tolerance enables realistic transitions from seedlings to mature plants of multiple species. Based on literature-derived parameterizations of ecological thresholds, DYCOVE reproduces realistic vegetation distributions and zonations both in tidally- and fluvially-impacted coastal environments with an F1 score above 0.8 and species distribution with a total accuracy of 70 %. DYCOVE’s flexible, species-agnostic framework allows exploration of how various vegetation types influence coastal hydrodynamics, sediment transport, and land-building, representing a crucial advancement in process-based eco-hydro(morpho)dynamic modelling.
Dear authors,
Unfortunately, after checking your manuscript, it has come to our attention that it does not comply with our "Code and Data Policy".
https://www.geoscientific-model-development.net/policies/code_and_data_policy.html
You have archived your code on GitHub. However, GitHub is not a suitable repository for scientific publication. GitHub itself instructs authors to use other long-term archival and publishing alternatives, such as Zenodo. In addition, in your manuscript you do not provide a repository for the data used to validate the model's results, nor for the ANUGA model also used in your work.
The GMD review and publication process depends on reviewers and community commentators being able to access, during the discussion phase, the code and data on which a manuscript depends, and on ensuring the provenance of replicability of the published papers for years after their publication. Please, therefore, publish your code and data in one of the appropriate repositories and reply to this comment with the relevant information (link and a permanent identifier for it (e.g. DOI)) as soon as possible. We cannot have manuscripts under discussion that do not comply with our policy.
Later, if the Topical Editor decides to continue with the review or publication process of your manuscript and you are requested to upload a new version of it, then The 'Code and Data Availability’ section of your manuscript must also be modified to cite the new repository locations, and corresponding references added to the bibliography.
I must note that if you do not fix this problem, we cannot continue with the peer-review process or accept your manuscript for publication in GMD.
Juan A. Añel
Geosci. Model Dev. Executive Editor