Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-3328
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-3328
03 Jul 2026
 | 03 Jul 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for The Cryosphere (TC).

Thermokarst and Microtopography Enhance Carbon Fluxes from an Arctic Tussock Tundra Site

Kelcy Kent, Kyle Arndt, Danielle Trangmoe, Patrick Murphy, Sigrid Dengel, Margaret Torn, Oriana Chafe, Marco Montemayor, and Susan Natali

Abstract. As the Arctic warms, thawing permafrost releases carbon dioxide (CO2) and methane (CH4) into the atmosphere, creating a positive feedback to warming. However, carbon loss from permafrost soils is poorly understood due to the paucity of in-situ carbon flux measurements from Arctic landscapes, complicating efforts to accurately characterize models. To gain insight into the interannual variability of carbon fluxes in response to environmental conditions, as well as the impact of thermokarst landscape features and microtopography on carbon fluxes, we analyzed a six-year (July 2017 – September 2023) eddy covariance tower (EC) dataset from a tussock tundra site with thermoerosional drainage channels near Council, Alaska. Flux chambers located in upland, lowland, and sloped plots near the EC tower measured differences in carbon fluxes by landscape position and inundation status from 2017 – 2019. EC data indicated Council ranged from a weak net carbon sink (-6.50 g C m-2) to a moderate source (30.93 g C m-2) with higher net carbon emissions during warmer temperatures. Growing season CO2 uptake was significantly greater from thermokarst drainage channels south of the tower, but CO2 emissions from these channels were significantly lower in the winter compared to the northern tundra. Similarly, thermokarst, microtopography, and inundation enhanced CH4 emissions. These findings, which establish a baseline for continued long-term monitoring of carbon fluxes and environmental conditions at the Council tundra site, highlight the importance of including the influence of microtopography and landscape features, such as thermokarst, in assessments of current and future carbon balance of the Arctic.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Kelcy Kent, Kyle Arndt, Danielle Trangmoe, Patrick Murphy, Sigrid Dengel, Margaret Torn, Oriana Chafe, Marco Montemayor, and Susan Natali

Status: open (until 14 Aug 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Kelcy Kent, Kyle Arndt, Danielle Trangmoe, Patrick Murphy, Sigrid Dengel, Margaret Torn, Oriana Chafe, Marco Montemayor, and Susan Natali
Kelcy Kent, Kyle Arndt, Danielle Trangmoe, Patrick Murphy, Sigrid Dengel, Margaret Torn, Oriana Chafe, Marco Montemayor, and Susan Natali
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 03 Jul 2026
Download
Short summary
With Arctic warming, thawing frozen ground releases greenhouse gases that further accelerate climate change. We analyzed a six-year record of carbon dioxide and methane gas exchange between the ecosystem and atmosphere at an Arctic tundra site, finding the site shifted between absorbing and releasing carbon depending on temperature, soil moisture, and landscape features, highlighting the importance of accounting for landscape variation when tracking and predicting evolving Arctic carbon stocks.
Share