Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-3321
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-3321
19 Jun 2026
 | 19 Jun 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Hydrology and Earth System Sciences (HESS).

Divergent responses of streamflow reanalysis errors to precipitation reanalysis errors modulated by catchment heterogeneity

Qiang Li, Tongtiegang Zhao, Zexin Chen, and Zeqing Huang

Abstract. Streamflow reanalysis is vital for water resources management and climate impact assessment; however, the extent to which it is affected by precipitation forcing errors remains poorly understood. Focusing on the reanalysis dataset of Global Flood Awareness System driven by the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts Reanalysis v5 (GloFAS-ERA5), this paper details how streamflow reanalysis errors respond to precipitation errors. Specifically, the root mean square errors (RMSEs) are calculated by hydrological year for reanalysis products across 671 catchments in the Catchment Attributes and Meteorology for Large-sample Studies (CAMELS) dataset; and by combining catchment-specific linear regression with global panel regression, the effects of precipitation errors on streamflow errors are quantified. The results demonstrate an improved performance from GloFAS-ERA5 v2.1 to v4.0, with the median RMSE decreasing from 2.16 mm to 1.81 mm. For GloFAS-ERA5 v4.0, the panel regression indicates that for every 1 mm increase in precipitation RMSE, the corresponding streamflow RMSE increases by an average of 0.51 mm–reflecting the buffering capacity of catchment storage. In the meantime, the corresponding catchment-specific increase of streamflow RMSE reaches up to 2.5 mm in humid catchments but remains below 0.7 mm in arid catchments. These divergent responses reflect that the saturation-excess mechanism makes the precipitation errors immediately affect the streamflow error while soil moisture deficits dampen their effects. Furthermore, incorporating interaction terms into panel regression increases the coefficient of determination (R2) from 0.16 to 0.36, indicating that error responses are modulated by catchment heterogeneity. This modulation is further confirmed by targeted case studies, indicating that the temperature controls the storage and release of snow water, thereby dampening and delaying the responses of streamflow errors to precipitation errors in snow-dominated catchments. These findings provide a valuable diagnostic method and practical guidance for applications of global streamflow reanalysis to complex, heterogeneous catchments.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Qiang Li, Tongtiegang Zhao, Zexin Chen, and Zeqing Huang

Status: open (until 31 Jul 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Qiang Li, Tongtiegang Zhao, Zexin Chen, and Zeqing Huang
Qiang Li, Tongtiegang Zhao, Zexin Chen, and Zeqing Huang
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 19 Jun 2026
Download
Short summary
This study explores how streamflow reanalysis responses to precipitation forcing errors across 671 catchments in the United States. For the GloFAS-ERA5 v4.0, every 1 mm increase in precipitation error causes an averaged increase of 0.51 mm streamflow error due to catchment’s buffering effects. This response varies by catchments where humid regions amplify the increased streamflow errors up to 2.5 mm due to saturated soils, but arid and snowy regions delay or dampen them through storage.
Share