Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-330
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-330
29 Jan 2026
 | 29 Jan 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for SOIL (SOIL).

Non-inversion tillage benefits soil N retention during bare soil period coinciding with wet spell

Annelie Holzkämper, Ernst Spiess, Clay Humphrys, Karin Meier-Zimmermann, Olivier Heller, Thomas Keller, and Volker Prasuhn

Abstract. Recent meta-analyses suggest risks of increased nitrate leaching with the implementation of reduced tillage practices. This study aimed to quantify effects of a subsidized and commonly implemented form of non-inversion tillage in Switzerland (NIT, i.e. chisel ploughing) in comparison to conventional tillage (CT, i.e. mouldboard ploughing) on nitrate leaching and its driving processes (i.e. water fluxes, soil temperature, plant uptake). A lysimeter experiment was conducted at the lysimeter facility Reckenholz/Zurich in Switzerland, mimicking tillage differences. Results after three years of treatment implementation show that during the following three years, cumulative nitrate leaching was 26% higher under CT than under NIT (i.e. 63±10kg/haN with CT vs. 46±9kg/haN with NIT). The observed effect was driven by differences in nitrate concentrations in seepage water rather than seepage water amounts. The beneficial effect of NIT on nitrate leaching was most pronounced during and shortly after a bare soil period following sugar beet cultivation, which coincided with above-average spring precipitation. These findings suggest that reduced soil management may hold the potential to reduce nitrate leaching during winter and spring wet spells with poor plant cover, which are expected to become more frequent with progressing climate change. 

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Annelie Holzkämper, Ernst Spiess, Clay Humphrys, Karin Meier-Zimmermann, Olivier Heller, Thomas Keller, and Volker Prasuhn

Status: open (until 12 Mar 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Annelie Holzkämper, Ernst Spiess, Clay Humphrys, Karin Meier-Zimmermann, Olivier Heller, Thomas Keller, and Volker Prasuhn
Annelie Holzkämper, Ernst Spiess, Clay Humphrys, Karin Meier-Zimmermann, Olivier Heller, Thomas Keller, and Volker Prasuhn
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 29 Jan 2026
Download
Short summary
Over three years of observation in a Swiss lysimeter, our results show that cumulative nitrate leaching was 26 % higher under conventional tillage than under non-inversion tillage. This difference was driven by nitrate concentrations in seepage water rather than by differences in seepage water volumes. The beneficial effect of non-inversion tillage was most pronounced during and shortly after a bare-soil period following sugar beet cultivation, coinciding with above-average spring precipitation.
Share