Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-3289
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-3289
02 Jul 2026
 | 02 Jul 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).

Cloud environment controls the precipitation response to liquid propane (LP) seeding: an ice nucleation parameterization for LP seeding and idealized simulations

Sisi Chen, Lulin Xue, Michelle Harrold, Sarah Tessendorf, Jamie Wolff, Nick Dawson, and Darcy Jacobson

Abstract. This study presents a liquid propane (LP) seeding parameterization in the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model. Two formulas derived from laboratory experiments express ice production as a function of temperature and LP release rate. The seeding impacts on clouds and precipitation are evaluated through idealized two-dimensional simulations spanning two mountain heights, four environmental soundings, and four seeding scenarios. The simulations reveal an environment-dependent microphysical response in which the ice conversion process near the seeding site varies with the natural rain efficiency, from a snow-dominated regime where riming is limited to a riming-dominated regime in efficient-rain conditions. The largest enhancement occurs in the low mountain, where supercooled liquid water (SLW) persists and natural precipitation remains weak. Seeding impacts in the high mountain are weaker, with a mild reduction in total precipitation in the case where natural rain process is the most efficient. Snow enhancement dominates the net total precipitation increase. Compared with AgI seeding in prior idealized studies, LP is weaker in both magnitude and spatial extent because LP-generated ice requires a continuous SLW cloud layer for dispersion from the surface to clouds. Nevertheless, LP is effective at temperatures warmer than -6 °C where AgI is less active, suggesting complementary roles of the two seeding agents. These simulations provide a physical basis for understanding LP seeding responses and for future three-dimensional real-case simulations, field evaluation, and direct comparison with AgI seeding simulations.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Sisi Chen, Lulin Xue, Michelle Harrold, Sarah Tessendorf, Jamie Wolff, Nick Dawson, and Darcy Jacobson

Status: open (until 13 Aug 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Sisi Chen, Lulin Xue, Michelle Harrold, Sarah Tessendorf, Jamie Wolff, Nick Dawson, and Darcy Jacobson
Sisi Chen, Lulin Xue, Michelle Harrold, Sarah Tessendorf, Jamie Wolff, Nick Dawson, and Darcy Jacobson
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 02 Jul 2026
Download
Short summary
Glaciogenic seeding is used in winter mountains to enhance snowpack and address water scarcity. Liquid propane seeding, a type of glaciogenic seeding, generates ice in relatively warm conditions where silver iodide is less effective, yet no models exist to simulate its impacts. We built a liquid propane seeding module in a weather model and tested it over idealized mountains. Simulations show snow enhancement is strongest where clouds are rich in supercooled liquid and rain formation is weak.
Share