Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-3250
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-3250
30 Jul 2026
 | 30 Jul 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Biogeosciences (BG).

Opposite-sign influences of canopy structural and physiological dynamics on water–carbon biogeography

Daniel Short Gianotti and Dara Entekhabi

Abstract. The terrestrial water and carbon cycles are strongly coupled through both vegetation canopy extent (structural) dynamics and canopy-intensive, physiological water-use dynamics. Although landscape vegetation productivity is directly proportional to both canopy extent and water use efficiency by definition, they are negatively correlated with each other at monthly scale, and their roles in connecting carbon uptake with water variables are in opposition. This study separates the roles of structural and physiological dynamics in driving a functional biogeographical pattern. We show that the relationship between Gross Primary Production (GPP) and Evaporative Fraction (EF, the normalized ratio of evaporation to available energy) more strongly links local temporal behavior with spatial biogeographical patterns than do rain-use efficiency relationships. This GPP–EF relationship has opposite correlation at daily (n = 325,374) and monthly timescales (n = 11,776): daily dynamics evolve toward a monthly “attractor” curve, while monthly correlations are positive and align with an across-site, across-biome, biogeographical relationship. Similarly, vegetation canopy extent and EF show the same timescale-dependent pattern: canopy extent increases with daily drying (negative correlation), then co-evolves positively with EF at monthly scales. The relationship between EF and physiological, canopy-averaged water-use efficiency is negatively-correlated at all scales. At monthly and longer timescales, structural canopy dynamics dominate water–carbon coupling over physiological water-use responses.

These results imply that modeling water–carbon feedbacks at timescales beyond daily requires accurate representation of both (a) dynamic canopy extent and (b) canopy-averaged water-use efficiency, or risk conflating opposite-sign correlations with changes in productivity. Specifically, vegetation growth, mortality, and responsive canopy phenology (structural processes) dominate water–carbon coupling over physiological water-use efficiency at timescales beyond daily.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Daniel Short Gianotti and Dara Entekhabi

Status: open (until 10 Sep 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Daniel Short Gianotti and Dara Entekhabi
Daniel Short Gianotti and Dara Entekhabi

Viewed

Total article views: 54 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
44 8 2 54 8 3 3
  • HTML: 44
  • PDF: 8
  • XML: 2
  • Total: 54
  • Supplement: 8
  • BibTeX: 3
  • EndNote: 3
Views and downloads (calculated since 30 Jul 2026)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 30 Jul 2026)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 47 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 47 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 31 Jul 2026
Download
Short summary
We show that plant CO2 uptake and evaporation are strong predictors of each other, and that plant density, plant efficiency, and CO2 uptake all grow together for days after rain. But, when averaging over months, plant density and CO2 uptake work together, while efficiency works against the other two. Canopy extent / water dynamics dominate efficiency / water dynamics in plant CO2 uptake.
Share