Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-3174
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-3174
21 Jul 2026
 | 21 Jul 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).

Overestimated organic condensation reveals an underperformance in estimation of ambient nanoparticle growth

Chuang Li, Runlong Cai, Zexin Chen, Gan Yang, Feilin Zhao, Yueyang Li, Jingyu An, Qiwen Sun, Sijia Yin, Shimeng Xu, Yiliang Liu, Douglas Worsnop, Lei Yao, and Lin Wang

Abstract. Atmospheric new particle formation (NPF) supplies up to half of global cloud condensation nuclei, yet the growth of sub-15 nm nanoparticles—the stage most vulnerable to scavenging—remains poorly constrained, largely because the volatility of oxygenated organic molecules (OOMs) is highly uncertain. Using a purpose-built laminar flow reactor that isolates particle–particle coagulation from OOM condensation, we show that six of seven widely used OOM volatility parameterizations substantially overestimate nanoparticle growth rates, with the largest bias under the high-NOx conditions. A recent parameterization constrained by ambient organic aerosol volatility reproduces our laboratory observations across diverse OOM precursors, seed sizes (3–5 nm), and NOx regimes. By applying this laboratory-validated framework to NPF events at Lake Tai, China, in summer 2023, OOM and H2SO4 condensation explain about 53 % of the observed 3–15 nm growth rate, leaving a residual that persists even at the upper bound of measurement uncertainty. Together, our laboratory experiments and field observations provide strong evidence that particle coagulation and vapour condensation alone cannot account for ambient nanoparticle growth, revealing a clear gap in our understanding of this process. This gap may point to additional processes, not yet accounted for in current frameworks, that could contribute to nanoparticle growth in polluted atmospheres, or it may reflect uncertainties in other parameters.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Chuang Li, Runlong Cai, Zexin Chen, Gan Yang, Feilin Zhao, Yueyang Li, Jingyu An, Qiwen Sun, Sijia Yin, Shimeng Xu, Yiliang Liu, Douglas Worsnop, Lei Yao, and Lin Wang

Status: open (until 01 Sep 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Chuang Li, Runlong Cai, Zexin Chen, Gan Yang, Feilin Zhao, Yueyang Li, Jingyu An, Qiwen Sun, Sijia Yin, Shimeng Xu, Yiliang Liu, Douglas Worsnop, Lei Yao, and Lin Wang
Chuang Li, Runlong Cai, Zexin Chen, Gan Yang, Feilin Zhao, Yueyang Li, Jingyu An, Qiwen Sun, Sijia Yin, Shimeng Xu, Yiliang Liu, Douglas Worsnop, Lei Yao, and Lin Wang

Viewed

Total article views: 80 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
57 19 4 80 11 3 3
  • HTML: 57
  • PDF: 19
  • XML: 4
  • Total: 80
  • Supplement: 11
  • BibTeX: 3
  • EndNote: 3
Views and downloads (calculated since 21 Jul 2026)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 21 Jul 2026)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 80 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 80 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 22 Jul 2026
Download
Short summary
Aerosols are tiny particles that help clouds form and shape the climate. Newly formed particles must grow quickly to survive, yet how they grow is poorly understood. Combining laboratory experiments with field measurements, we tested seven common methods for predicting this growth. Most overestimate how strongly organic vapours condense onto particles, especially in polluted air, and even the best cannot fully explain the growth we observe, revealing a gap in our understanding.
Share