Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-3153
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-3153
14 Aug 2026
 | 14 Aug 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).

Assessing the ability of stationary in situ ground-based observations to constrain local methane emissions in space and time in New York State

Matthew L. Loman, Lee T. Murray, Peter D. Ivatt, Róisín Commane, Andrew Hallward-Driemeier, Raghav Dhall, Eric M. Leibensperger, Nicholas Balasus, Lucas Estrada, Melissa P. Sulprizio, Maryann R. Sargent, and Felix Vogel

Abstract. Reductions in methane (CH4) emissions are essential to mitigate near-term climate forcing and enable jurisdictions such as New York State (NYS) to meet greenhouse-gas (GHG) reduction targets. This requires quantification of present-day emissions, underpinned by a robust, independent monitoring framework capable of verifying reported reductions. Assessing whether existing observational infrastructure meets these requirements is essential for emissions accounting and policy implementation. Here, we evaluate the ability of stationary in situ methane observations, coupled with a Bayesian inverse modeling framework – the Integrated Methane Inversion (IMI) driven by chemistry-transport model GEOS-Chem – to constrain annual methane emissions and trends across NYS for 2018–2024. We develop capacity for the IMI to assimilate hourly measurements from 29 sites, including four new high-precision continuous monitoring stations calibrated according to international standards. Prior methane emissions for NYS are based on the Gridded New York State (GNYS) inventory, which disaggregates the official NYS bottom-up total state methane emissions estimate for 2020. The observational network provides its strongest constraints around the New York City metropolitan area. Aggregated NYS posterior methane emissions are consistent with the GNYS prior within estimated uncertainties; however, we identify localized emission biases, including underestimates in the New York City area (p < 0.05) and broad overestimates throughout most of NYS. We detect statistically significant regional trends in select locations, but no robust statewide trend over 2018–2024. These results demonstrate the strengths and limitations of stationary in situ monitoring for policy-relevant methane verification and underscore the need for top-down strategies that integrate observations from multiple platforms.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Matthew L. Loman, Lee T. Murray, Peter D. Ivatt, Róisín Commane, Andrew Hallward-Driemeier, Raghav Dhall, Eric M. Leibensperger, Nicholas Balasus, Lucas Estrada, Melissa P. Sulprizio, Maryann R. Sargent, and Felix Vogel

Status: open (until 25 Sep 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Matthew L. Loman, Lee T. Murray, Peter D. Ivatt, Róisín Commane, Andrew Hallward-Driemeier, Raghav Dhall, Eric M. Leibensperger, Nicholas Balasus, Lucas Estrada, Melissa P. Sulprizio, Maryann R. Sargent, and Felix Vogel

Data sets

Datasets from "Assessing the ability of stationary in situ ground-based observations to constrain local methane emissions in space and time in New York State" M. Loman et al. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20451108

Matthew L. Loman, Lee T. Murray, Peter D. Ivatt, Róisín Commane, Andrew Hallward-Driemeier, Raghav Dhall, Eric M. Leibensperger, Nicholas Balasus, Lucas Estrada, Melissa P. Sulprizio, Maryann R. Sargent, and Felix Vogel
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 14 Aug 2026
Download
Short summary
We evaluate methane emissions and their trends in New York State based on observations of methane from 29 sites, including four new long-term sites. These observations are most sensitive to emissions in southeastern New York State, including New York City. We find regional trends and biases in some locations, including underestimated emissions in the New York City area. Our results also demonstrate that policy-relevant validation of methane emissions needs a combination of observation platforms.
Share