Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-3122
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-3122
11 Jun 2026
 | 11 Jun 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for The Cryosphere (TC).

A Shifting Balance: Dynamic and Thermodynamic Controls on Arctic Sea Ice Thickness

Luisa von Albedyll, Robert Ricker, Frank Kauker, Daniel Krogmann, and Stefan Hendricks

Abstract. Arctic sea ice thickness has declined rapidly over recent decades, yet the relative roles of thermodynamic growth and dynamic redistribution in driving this change remain poorly constrained at basin scale. We quantify thermodynamic and dynamic contributions to sea-ice thickness change together with their uncertainties across the Arctic from 2002 to 2020 by combining satellite-derived thickness with sea-ice model simulations (Icepack) along trajectories. Separating dynamical thickening (30%), dynamical thinning (−24%), and lead-ice growth (10.2%) shows that dynamic processes contribute nearly as much to the average winter ice growth of 0.21 m per month as thermodynamic processes (35.8%). Regional, seasonal, and thickness-dependent variability is consistent with large-scale dynamic patterns and the ice-growth feedback. We quantify the effects of the overly smooth deformation forcing, which leads to an underestimation of large dynamic events and a substantial noise floor during dynamically quiet periods, and relate their magnitude to other sources of uncertainty. Analyzing the long-term trend from 2002–2020, we resolve a weak increase in median sea ice deformation (1.5% per year) and net dynamic thickness change (12% per year) within the limits of our study setup. Overall, our results suggest that increasing deformation in the Arctic enhances net dynamic thickness change and acts as a negative feedback in the pan-Arctic winter thickness budget.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Luisa von Albedyll, Robert Ricker, Frank Kauker, Daniel Krogmann, and Stefan Hendricks

Status: open (until 23 Jul 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Luisa von Albedyll, Robert Ricker, Frank Kauker, Daniel Krogmann, and Stefan Hendricks
Luisa von Albedyll, Robert Ricker, Frank Kauker, Daniel Krogmann, and Stefan Hendricks
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 11 Jun 2026
Download
Short summary
Using satellite observations and model simulations, we studied winter Arctic sea ice thickness change. Separating thickening from ridging and thinning from lead opening showed that dynamic processes contribute nearly as much to winter ice growth as freezing. Between 2002 and 2020, dynamic thickness change increased linked to stronger sea ice deformation. This is consistent with the idea that sea ice dynamics partly counteract thinning of Arctic sea ice during ongoing climate warming.
Share