Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-3119
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-3119
16 Jun 2026
 | 16 Jun 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Biogeosciences (BG).

Understanding ecosystem gross primary productivity, evapotranspiration, and water use efficiency of maize using ISBA-A-gs land surface model over temperate and tropical semi-arid climates

Syam Chintala, Lionel Jarlan, Vincent Rivalland, Aaron Boone, Oluwakemi Dare-Idowu, Valerie Le Dantec, Gilles Boulet, BVN P. Kambhammettu, and Aurore Brut

Abstract. Water use efficiency (WUE), a key ecohydrological indicator linking carbon assimilation and vegetation water loss, is critical for understanding ecosystem responses under changing hydro-climatic conditions. Process-based land surface models (LSMs) are widely used to represent carbon-water interactions; however, their ability to simulate ecosystem-scale WUE across contrasting climates remains limited. This study evaluates the performance of the Interactions between Soil-Biosphere-Atmosphere model with A-gs photosynthesis scheme (ISBA-A-gs) implemented within the SURFEX land surface modelling platform in simulating gross primary productivity (GPP), evapotranspiration (ET), and WUE (GPP/ET) for maize grown under temperate (France, FR-Lam) and tropical semi-arid (India, Ind-IITH) climates. The model was driven by site-specific meteorological and vegetation variables across six growing seasons under sprinkler irrigation at FR-Lam, and two seasons (monsoon and winter) under alternate furrow irrigation (AFI) at Ind-IITH. Model calibration revealed that FR-Lam is characterized by relatively higher cuticular conductance and pronounced atmospheric control on stomatal behaviour, whereas at Ind-IITH, AFI-induced adjustments in mesophyll conductance and soil moisture stress thresholds. At FR-Lam, ISBA-A-gs simulated the seasonal mean cumulative GPP, ET, and WUE of 1039 ± 20 gC m-2, 610 ± 31 kg H2O m-2, and 1.70 ± 0.10 gC kg-1 H2O, respectively, as compared to measured values of 1026 ± 30 gC m-2, 562 ± 42 kg H2O m-2, and 1.82 ± 0.11 gC kg-1 H2O correspondingly. At Ind-IITH, the model simulated the seasonal mean cumulative GPP, ET, and WUE of 766 ± 15 gC m-2, 567 ± 30 kg H2O m-2, and 1.35 ± 0.11 gC kg-1 H2O, respectively, as compared to measured values of 793 ± 11 gC m-2, 522 ± 20 kg H2O m-2, and 1.51 ± 0.12 gC kg-1 H2O correspondingly. Further, the diagnostic analysis using the GPP·VPD0.5-ET relationship revealed that ISBA-A-gs realistically captures the coupling between carbon assimilation and transpiration-driven water loss. Overall, ISBA-A-gs demonstrates strong capability in simulating carbon and water fluxes of maize, particularly in representing WUE dynamics under contrasting climate regimes.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Syam Chintala, Lionel Jarlan, Vincent Rivalland, Aaron Boone, Oluwakemi Dare-Idowu, Valerie Le Dantec, Gilles Boulet, BVN P. Kambhammettu, and Aurore Brut

Status: open (until 28 Jul 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Syam Chintala, Lionel Jarlan, Vincent Rivalland, Aaron Boone, Oluwakemi Dare-Idowu, Valerie Le Dantec, Gilles Boulet, BVN P. Kambhammettu, and Aurore Brut
Syam Chintala, Lionel Jarlan, Vincent Rivalland, Aaron Boone, Oluwakemi Dare-Idowu, Valerie Le Dantec, Gilles Boulet, BVN P. Kambhammettu, and Aurore Brut
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 16 Jun 2026
Download
Short summary
We studied how maize crops use water and absorb carbon under contrasting climates using a land surface model coupled with a photosynthesis scheme. The model successfully reproduced ecosystem-scale crop productivity, water loss, and water use efficiency, a key indicator linking carbon uptake and water use. Our results show that the model can reliably capture crop responses to climate and irrigation practices, helping improve predictions of agricultural water use and crop productivity.
Share