Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-3098
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-3098
23 Jun 2026
 | 23 Jun 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Biogeosciences (BG).

Reassessing the Permafrost Carbon Feedback: The Decisive Role of Dynamic Vegetation

Thomas Kleinen, Helena Bergstedt, Philipp de Vrese, Tobias Stacke, and Victor Brovkin

Abstract. The permafrost region stores ∼1300 PgC, and its response to warming is a significant uncertainty in future climate projections. We assess how the treatment of vegetation dynamics and CO2 fertilisation influences the permafrost carbon feedback (PCF) by performing experiments with the land-surface model ICON-Land. A vertically explicit implementation of the YASSO soil-carbon scheme resolves depth-dependent carbon pools, as well as temperature and moisture controls on decomposition, while a newly introduced cold-adapted shrub plant-functional type (PFT) enables a more realistic description of Arctic vegetation.

Using CMIP5-derived climate forcing, we performed nine offline experiments from the year 2020 to 2299 CE under RCP 2.6, 4.5 and 8.5. The experiments isolate the effects of (a) climate warming with fixed 2019 CO2 and vegetation, (b) rising CO2 with constant vegetation cover, and (c) the effects of both rising CO2 and a fully dynamic vegetation. All simulations start from a data-constrained pre-industrial permafrost soil carbon inventory.

When vegetation is held static, strong warming (RCP 8.5) alone drives a loss of ∼650 PgC by 2300 CE, turning the permafrost region from a modest sink of carbon into a strong source. Allowing CO2 fertilisation but no vegetation change reduces the loss to ∼250 PgC because enhanced NPP increases litter inputs. In the fully dynamic experiments, shrubification and northward tree expansion dramatically increase aboveground biomass (of up to 199 PgC) and litterfall, limiting soil-C loss to only ~70 PgC. Consequently, total permafrost-region carbon declines by < 100 PgC under RCP 8.5 and even shows a net gain under the low-emission pathways (RCPs 2.6 and 4.5).

These results demonstrate that the sign and magnitude of the PCF are highly sensitive to the representation of vegetation dynamics. Dynamic competition among PFTs, CO2-driven NPP enhancement, and the resulting shifts in carbon accumulation together can offset most of the carbon released by thawing soils. Incorporating realistic Arctic vegetation, especially cold-tolerant shrubs, is therefore decisive for reliable projections of the permafrost carbon feedback and its impact on the global carbon cycle.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Thomas Kleinen, Helena Bergstedt, Philipp de Vrese, Tobias Stacke, and Victor Brovkin

Status: open (until 04 Aug 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Thomas Kleinen, Helena Bergstedt, Philipp de Vrese, Tobias Stacke, and Victor Brovkin

Data sets

Reassessing the Permafrost Carbon Feedback: The Decisive Role of Dynamic Vegetation T. Kleinen et al. https://doi.org/10.17617/3.1ROAHN

Model code and software

Reassessing the Permafrost Carbon Feedback: The Decisive Role of Dynamic Vegetation T. Kleinen et al. https://doi.org/10.17617/3.1ROAHN

Interactive computing environment

Reassessing the Permafrost Carbon Feedback: The Decisive Role of Dynamic Vegetation T. Kleinen et al. https://doi.org/10.17617/3.1ROAHN

Thomas Kleinen, Helena Bergstedt, Philipp de Vrese, Tobias Stacke, and Victor Brovkin
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 23 Jun 2026
Download
Short summary
The Arctic holds a large amount of carbon in frozen permafrost soils. Climate change will thaw the permafrost, leading to carbon decomposition and CO2 emission. Using a land surface model, we tested the effect of plant distribution changes in low, medium and high warming futures. If the plant distribution is allowed to adapt to a changed climate, biomass increases strongly, limiting carbon losses to ~70  PgC under high warming, and even a small net gain of carbon in low warming scenarios.
Share