the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Transport Efficiency of Turbulent Parcel in the Marine Boundary Layer and Its Implications for Droplet Activation in Marine Cloud Brightening
Abstract. Marine cloud brightening (MCB) has been proposed as a potential climate intervention strategy in which sea-salt aerosols are introduced into the marine boundary layer to enhance cloud albedo by increasing cloud droplet number concentrations (CDNC). However, whether turbulent motions can efficiently transport sea-surface-released aerosols to the cloud base remains a major uncertainty in evaluating MCB feasibility. This study investigates a stratocumulus case over the tropical Southeast Atlantic using large-eddy simulation (LES) coupled with the FLEXPART Lagrangian particle dispersion model to quantify turbulent parcel transport efficiency. Short-duration releases and high-LWP stages favor stronger transport of turbulent parcels to the cloud base. For parcels released at 00:00 UTC on 24 September, the peak instantaneous arrival rate reaches 3.39 % within 15 min in d02, whereas it decreases to 1.86 % and the peak arrival time is delayed to 17 min in d04; the corresponding cumulative arrival rate decreases from 94.16 % to 79.70 %. Although the mean in-cloud residence time decreases with increasing resolution, parcels with extremely long residence times become more frequent. Under the adopted activation parameterization, higher-resolution LES simulations yield higher activation fraction (AF) because they better resolve strong cloud-base updrafts, with AF ranging from 0.73–0.91 in d02 to 0.92–0.96 in d04. The AF is relatively insensitive to release duration but increases under high-LWP conditions. These results provide a process-level quantification of parcel transport, in-cloud residence time, and conditional activation, establishing a physical basis for evaluating aerosol delivery constraints in MCB applications.
- Preprint
(2338 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: final response (author comments only)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-3025', Lucas McMichael, 17 Jul 2026
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2026/egusphere-2026-3025/egusphere-2026-3025-RC1-supplement.pdfCitation: https://doi.org/
10.5194/egusphere-2026-3025-RC1 - RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-3025', Annelot Broerze, 17 Aug 2026
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 83 | 37 | 24 | 144 | 22 | 16 |
- HTML: 83
- PDF: 37
- XML: 24
- Total: 144
- BibTeX: 22
- EndNote: 16
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1