the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
mLDNDCv1.0: A Machine Learning-based Surrogate of LandscapeDNDC for Optimising Cropping Systems in Denmark
Abstract. Optimising Danish arable management is critical for reducing greenhouse‐gas (GHG) emissions and nitrogen (N) losses while maintaining or even improving crop productivity and soil health. Process-based models such as LandscapeDNDC can simulate the effects of management on agroecosystem functioning. However, their computational demand limits large-scale optimisation. Here we present mLDNDCv1.0, a tree-based machine-learning surrogate of LandscapeDNDC that allows for the rapid exploration of large decision spaces without sacrificing mechanistic fidelity. We generated a synthetic training set of >45 million LandscapeDNDC simulations from a full factorial of soils, climate (2011–2020), and management options for winter wheat. We benchmarked gradient-boosted tree algorithms (LightGBM, XGBoost, CatBoost) on predictive performance. XGBoost delivered the most accurate and stable predictions for the core indicators in this study: soil N2O emissions (R2 = 0.81), NO3− leaching (R2 = 0.84), yield (R2 = 0.93), and for soil-organic-carbon stock changes (R2 = 0.86). The model maintained high accuracy when confronted with real management and environmental settings that reflected true operating conditions. Coupling mLDNDC with the multi-objective evolutionary algorithm NSGA-II allowed us to optimise millions of management combinations across all winter wheat fields in Denmark. Pareto-optimal solutions reduced N2O emissions by 27.5 ± 4.5 %, NO3− and leaching by 27 ± 3.0 %. These solutions also increased grain yield by 8.5 ± 1.5 % and soil-organic-carbon stocks by 1.2 ± 0.1 %, and improving nitrogen-use efficiency (NUE) by 10 ± 2 %, while turning the system into a net GHG sink (2200 ± 400 Mg CO2-eq ha−1 yr−1). These gains were achieved without increasing total fertiliser input. They arose from re-allocating mineral and organic fertliser N input, adjusting incorporation depth, and optimising residue, catch-crop, and irrigation practices. Thus, mLDNDC therefore provides a scalable, transparent framework for country-wide optimisation and real-time decision support in climate-smart agriculture.
- Preprint
(1922 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(922 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 22 Apr 2026)
-
CEC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-294 - No compliance with the policy of the journal', Juan Antonio Añel, 25 Mar 2026
reply
-
AC1: 'Reply on CEC1', Jaber Rahimi, 26 Mar 2026
reply
Dear Dr. Añel,
Thank you for your message and for highlighting this issue.
We have now released an updated version of the dataset on Zenodo to support the reproducibility of our study. The repository includes the harmonized field-level dataset for winter wheat in Denmark used for training the machine-learning surrogate model (mLDNDC), together with the associated feature engineering outputs at the field level.
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18573225
This dataset contains the management information and derived variables necessary to run and reproduce the surrogate modeling framework and optimization presented in our study. While some components of the original SmartField dataset are subject to data protection constraints (e.g., field’s coordination), we have ensured that all essential inputs required to train and use the ML model are included in the repository.
We believe that this fulfills the requirements of the Code and Data Policy and allows reviewers and readers to reproduce the key results of the manuscript.
Could you please confirm whether this is sufficient for the manuscript to proceed in the discussion and review process?
Thank you very much for your guidance.
Best regards,
Dr. Jaber Rahimi, on behalf of the authors
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-294-AC1 -
CEC2: 'Reply on AC1', Juan Antonio Añel, 28 Mar 2026
reply
Dear authors,
Many thanks for the quick reply. I can confirm that now the current version of your manuscript is in compliance with the policy of the journal.
Juan A. Añel
Geosci. Model Dev. Executive Editor
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-294-CEC2
-
CEC2: 'Reply on AC1', Juan Antonio Añel, 28 Mar 2026
reply
-
AC1: 'Reply on CEC1', Jaber Rahimi, 26 Mar 2026
reply
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 131 | 79 | 13 | 223 | 25 | 16 | 20 |
- HTML: 131
- PDF: 79
- XML: 13
- Total: 223
- Supplement: 25
- BibTeX: 16
- EndNote: 20
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
Dear authors,
Unfortunately, after checking your manuscript, it has come to our attention that it does not comply with our "Code and Data Policy".
https://www.geoscientific-model-development.net/policies/code_and_data_policy.html
Checking the Code and Data Availability section, and the repository that you provide for the data, we have not found the data from the harmonized field-level data from the SmartField project that you have used. If we have missed it, please let us know replying to this comment, and omit the remainder of this comment.
This issue should have been noticed before, and due to it, your manuscript should have not been accepted for Discussions or peer review in the journal. Therefore, the current situation is irregular.
The GMD review and publication process depends on reviewers and community commentators being able to access, during the discussion phase, the code and data on which a manuscript depends, and on ensuring the provenance of replicability of the published papers for years after their publication. Please, therefore, publish your data in one of the appropriate repositories and reply to this comment with the relevant information (link and a permanent identifier for it (e.g. DOI)) as soon as possible. We cannot have manuscripts under discussion that do not comply with our policy.
The 'Code and Data Availability’ section must also be modified to cite the new repository locations, and corresponding references added to the bibliography.
I must note that if you do not fix this problem, we cannot continue with the peer-review process or accept your manuscript for publication in GMD.
Juan A. Añel
Geosci. Model Dev. Executive Editor