Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2907
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2907
04 Jun 2026
 | 04 Jun 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).

GECKO-A v1.0: Exploring VOC Oxidation Trajectories Through Comparison with the Master Chemical Mechanism

Bernard Aumont, Richard Valorso, Andrew Rickard, Mike Jenkin, Julia Lee-Taylor, John Orlando, Sasha Madronich, Luc Vereecken, and Marie Camredon

Abstract. Numerical models are crucial tools for understanding complex chemical systems such as the atmosphere, and their sensitivity across a range of conditions. In atmospheric chemistry models, reaction mechanisms are used to represent chemical transformations and define the underlying system of equations. Building highly explicit mechanisms that capture the full complexity of organic oxidation occurring in the atmosphere remains challenging owing to the large number of intermediates involved, the breadth of reaction pathways, and the limited availability of reliable kinetic and thermodynamic data. The Generator for Explicit Chemistry and Kinetics of Organics in the Atmosphere (GECKO-A) was developed to address these limitations by enabling the systematic construction of near-explicit mechanisms. Here, we present its first open-source release (v1.0), which incorporates updated chemical protocols and structure-activity relationships, together with its companion box model for mechanism integration. GECKO-A's performance is evaluated through systematic comparisons with the Master Chemical Mechanism (MCM v3.3.1), based on simulations of the oxidation of five representative hydrocarbons (butane, octane, dodecane, toluene, and α-pinene) under environmental conditions ranging from urban to remote. The two approaches yield similar oxidation pathways for small and structurally simple compounds. However, differences increase with the size and complexity of the carbon backbone. In particular, the simplifications inherent to the MCM tend to limit the formation of multifunctional products and promote earlier fragmentation, resulting in notable discrepancies in the predicted volatility of secondary organic carbon and, consequently, in secondary organic aerosol yields.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Bernard Aumont, Richard Valorso, Andrew Rickard, Mike Jenkin, Julia Lee-Taylor, John Orlando, Sasha Madronich, Luc Vereecken, and Marie Camredon

Status: open (until 30 Jul 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Bernard Aumont, Richard Valorso, Andrew Rickard, Mike Jenkin, Julia Lee-Taylor, John Orlando, Sasha Madronich, Luc Vereecken, and Marie Camredon
Bernard Aumont, Richard Valorso, Andrew Rickard, Mike Jenkin, Julia Lee-Taylor, John Orlando, Sasha Madronich, Luc Vereecken, and Marie Camredon
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 04 Jun 2026
Download
Short summary
This study presents a tool that automatically generates chemical mechanisms describing the atmospheric oxidation of organic compounds. Its performance is evaluated by comparing simulations for five hydrocarbons under conditions ranging from urban to remote environments against a benchmark mechanism. Results highlight the tool’s ability to reproduce complex oxidation pathways and the formation of low-volatility species important for atmospheric aerosol formation.
Share