the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Towards quantifying contrails of fuel cell powered aircraft: first in-flight measurements of a fuel cell exhaust emulator
Abstract. Aviation forces the climate via multiple pathways: The emission of carbon dioxide (CO2) from conventional propulsion technologies has a warming effect, but also non-CO2 effects like contrail cirrus play a crucial role. For new hydrogen (H2) based propulsion concepts there are no direct CO2 and soot emissions, but higher water vapor emissions, which can affect the formation, micro-physical properties and the climate impact of contrails. In-flight measurements of relevant contrail and emission parameters of fuel cell propulsion systems are non-existent. In order to study contrail formation in the wake of fuel cell powered aircraft, a fuel cell exhaust emulator (FCEE) was designed by Airbus to produce the low temperature and high humidity exhaust conditions expected from these systems. Due to their unique exhaust composition and thermodynamic emission characteristic, processes such as plume mixing with ambient air are crucial to understand contrail formation. Further, to compare engine and fuel-dependent contrail properties, in situ methods derive a dilution corrected apparent ice emission index (AEI) using conservative tracers, like CO2 or nitrogen oxides (NOX). As the FCEE emits no such inert trace gas, a newly developed artificial dilution tracer system was used. The design and characterization of this system, as well as the significance and application for exhaust dilution and emission index assessment of fuel cell-powered aircraft in flight, are described.
As part of the Nephele flight test campaign, in December 2023 in Minnesota, USA, the prototype FCEE and artificial dilution tracer release system were installed on board a Convair C131. The sampling system was installed on a Piper Cheyenne 400LS chaser aircraft, together with instrumentation for emission and contrail measurement, both aircraft operated by AV Experts LLC. A proof-of-concept of the artificial tracer system was demonstrated in contrail and emission flights. Contrails formed on aerosol particles emitted by the FCEE near the homogeneous freezing threshold (at ambient temperatures around 230 K) were sampled at 400 hPa in distances between 50 and 1500 m behind the aircraft. An increase of AEI from 1.4·1013 to 4·1015 kg-1H2 with increasing temperature difference of 3 to 5 K below the homogeneous freezing temperature was observed. As contrails from fuel cell systems already form at higher ambient temperatures compared to conventional propulsion systems, these are the first contrail measurements in this temperature range. Complementary model simulations suggest that droplet freezing is responsible for the evolution of ice crystal numbers in this temperature range.
Competing interests: J.C., F.T., C.M., F.L. and C.R. are employed by Airbus. R.V. and A.V. are employed by AV Experts LLC. All the other authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.- Preprint
(6681 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(80807 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (extended)
- RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-2887', Anonymous Referee #1, 08 Sep 2026 reply
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 220 | 69 | 31 | 320 | 43 | 33 | 23 |
- HTML: 220
- PDF: 69
- XML: 31
- Total: 320
- Supplement: 43
- BibTeX: 33
- EndNote: 23
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
This paper deals with a concept to mimic hydrogen combustion engine and with a proposal for a tracer allowing dilution factor determination. Authors bring proposals to investigate airbone emission without a real engine.
Hydrogen engine substitute:
Technology use is smart and simple. Well describe in the manuscript. Appreciated the aim to emit the right amount of water vapor. Nevertheless, using non-filter air coming from aircraft engine bring a non negligeable amount of particles that allow contrail formation (ice nuclei) that should not appear with real hydrogen burning engine. Moreover, present of oil bring as well ice nuclei that can modified physico-chemistry. This concept is interesting but need few upgrade to help to assess impact of hydrogen engine
Tracer for dilution:
Having a tracer for hydrogen combustion emission is a great challenge. The proposal of this paper offers a clever approach. Authors well describe the process, the potential drawbacks (including environmental greenhouse price) and well evaluate evolution with a crossing experiment using CO2 of the first aircraft engine. Calibration and limit of dection of the Licor device is well manage considering airborne using. Into the paper, there is a strong explenation about all calculation and validation of determine dilution factors.
Airbone set-up
The suit of devices used are a little limited . For exemple, particle counters have a cutof at 7nm and may miss the main volatile particle matter part when they are close to the first aircraft. It is true that with the amount of particles coming from the emission, nucleation/adspotion will occur fast and the cut oof don't need to be small but with a real hydrogen experiment, it will be a must to have the possibility to assess volatile particles parts.
Using a thermodenuder can be not enough to remove volatile part and as the non-volatile particle matter measurement requierement from SAE E31, a catalytic stripper may be better.
Regarding best practice on particle measurement, the article lack description or at least reference about process to assess and correct particle lost into the sampling measurement system.
Airbone measurement
Authors bring some results of flight measurement at the end of the paper. Understanding that the main contribution of the article is FCEE and the tracer, some more input of experiment will be appreciate as do contrail formed persist or not? size of particles and ice cristal. Perhaps a second article is under writing.
Conclusion
This article provide more than a proof of concept of a device that aims to substitut full hydrogen engine. It can help to perform basic experiment but with limitations. The tracer approach can be develop on flight measurement on emission without CO2.
Authors provide clear description of FCEE and N2O tracer, more information can be provide on chasing aircraft measurement kit regarding last state of art on particle measurements