Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2870
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2870
01 Jul 2026
 | 01 Jul 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Biogeosciences (BG).

Quantifying the Near-term Response of the Ocean CO2 Sink to Emissions Mitigation

Amanda R. Fay, Dustin Carroll, Galen A. McKinley, Nicole S. Lovenduski, Dimitris Menemenlis, and Hong Zhang

Abstract. The ocean plays a critical role in sequestering carbon, yet how the air-sea carbon sink will respond to rapid reductions in atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) concentrations remains a key uncertainty for climate mitigation and carbon accounting. In this study, we utilize the ECCO-Darwin ocean biogeochemistry model to simulate the ocean’s response to a range of near-term CO2 mitigation scenarios. Our results demonstrate an immediate but spatially heterogeneous weakening of the ocean carbon sink following reduced atmospheric forcing. Global air-sea carbon uptake decreases substantially within the first several years of mitigation, with the magnitude of the reduction scaling with the strength of the mitigation scenario. We find that the mitigation signal is primarily confined to the upper-500 m, reflecting dominant decadal-scale ventilation pathways. The most pronounced reductions in uptake occur in subtropical thermocline regions, western boundary currents, and the subpolar North Atlantic — regions characterized by intense ventilation and rapid air-sea equilibration. These findings align with recent CMIP-based long-term projections and observation-based inversions, confirming that the areas currently dominating anthropogenic carbon uptake are also the most sensitive to atmospheric forcing changes. Our results suggest that observational efforts to track mitigation impacts should be prioritized in these high-latitude and boundary current systems, where signals emerge earliest and most strongly. Ultimately, this study underscores the rapid sensitivity of the ocean carbon sink to changes in atmospheric forcing and highlights the necessity of sustained, strategically-placed observations to detect and attribute changes in the global carbon budget under future climate strategies.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Amanda R. Fay, Dustin Carroll, Galen A. McKinley, Nicole S. Lovenduski, Dimitris Menemenlis, and Hong Zhang

Status: open (until 12 Aug 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Amanda R. Fay, Dustin Carroll, Galen A. McKinley, Nicole S. Lovenduski, Dimitris Menemenlis, and Hong Zhang
Amanda R. Fay, Dustin Carroll, Galen A. McKinley, Nicole S. Lovenduski, Dimitris Menemenlis, and Hong Zhang
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 01 Jul 2026
Download
Short summary
The ocean helps slow climate change by absorbing carbon dioxide, but our research shows this process weakens quickly when we reduce emissions. Using a sophisticated model, we found that the ocean’s carbon uptake drops within just a few years of mitigation. This change is most visible in the North Atlantic and Southern Ocean. To accurately track our progress in addressing climate change, we must focus global monitoring efforts on these specific, sensitive regions of the open sea.
Share