Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2832
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2832
24 Jun 2026
 | 24 Jun 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Weather and Climate Dynamics (WCD).

Physical Climate Drivers of East Africa’s March-April-May (MAM) seasonal rainfall Identified through Machine Learning Analysis

Sinclair Chinyoka, Masilin Gudoshava, Hussen Seid Endris, Shingirai Shepard Nangombe, Jordi Vila-Guerau De Arellano, and Gert-Jan Steeneveld

Abstract. East African March–May rainfall (MAM) remains difficult to predict despite its importance for agriculture, water resources, and disaster preparedness. This study identifies pre-season physical drivers of MAM rainfall and tests their value for probabilistic seasonal prediction. Predictor basins were derived from December and January sea surface temperature (SST), 2 m air temperature (T2), and sea-level pressure (SLP) anomalies relative to 1991–2020, using correlations with the leading mode of East African MAM rainfall and subsequent SHAP-based feature selection. The selected basin-derived indices were applied in Random Forest (RF) and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB) models. The dominant predictors appear to be the southern Indian Ocean T2 tendency, Australian and Eurasian T2 gradients, South Pacific and Antarctic T2 signals, Atlantic Niño tendency, and the Euro–African SLP gradient. T2-related predictors dominate both the January and December initialisations, showing that near-surface thermal gradients provide useful information in addition to SST memory. Walker-circulation diagnostics show that these drivers influence rainfall through pressure-gradient changes, tropical overturning, and upper-level wave-train development. For January initialisation, RF and XGB achieve spatially averaged Brier Skill Scores of 0.48 and 0.41, respectively, while the corresponding Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve values amounting to 0.72 and 0.65. These results demonstrate that physically constrained machine learning provides promising probabilistic skill for East African MAM rainfall prediction.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Sinclair Chinyoka, Masilin Gudoshava, Hussen Seid Endris, Shingirai Shepard Nangombe, Jordi Vila-Guerau De Arellano, and Gert-Jan Steeneveld

Status: open (until 05 Aug 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Sinclair Chinyoka, Masilin Gudoshava, Hussen Seid Endris, Shingirai Shepard Nangombe, Jordi Vila-Guerau De Arellano, and Gert-Jan Steeneveld
Sinclair Chinyoka, Masilin Gudoshava, Hussen Seid Endris, Shingirai Shepard Nangombe, Jordi Vila-Guerau De Arellano, and Gert-Jan Steeneveld
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 24 Jun 2026
Download
Short summary
Rainfall from March to May is vital for farming, water supply, and disaster planning in East Africa (EA)8, but it remains difficult to predict. We used climate data and machine learning to identify early signs that influence wet and dry seasons. The results show that EA rainfall is shaped by linked ocean, land, air temperature, and pressure patterns across several regions. This approach improves forecast skill and can support earlier, clearer warnings for climate-sensitive communities.
Share