Morphological and phylogenic variability of red snow algae in snowpacks along a glacial valley in Alaska
Abstract. Red snow blooms are visually similar but can be composed of different algal species and cell morphologies across sites, and the factors determining this spatial heterogeneity remain poorly understood. In this study, we investigated spatial variation in community structure, algal cell size, and morphology along gradients of elevation across a glacier and its forefield in Alaska. Microscopic observations revealed that the ice-based snowpack was dominated by spherical cells, whereas the soil-based snowpack was characterized by a higher abundance of non-spherical cells and larger spherical cells. Molecular analyses revealed that Sanguina predominated in the ice-based snowpack, while the relative abundance of other genera, including Chloromonas and Rosetta, were more abundant in the soil-based snowpack. Redundancy analysis showed that community structure was explained primarily by snow depth and elevation, whereas it was not significantly influenced by nutrient concentrations. Generalized linear models further indicated that size of spherical cell decreased with elevation, and the proportion of non-spherical cells decreased with snow depth. These results suggest that while snowmelt-driven environmental gradients govern the overall morphological and phylogenetic variability of red snow algae, the underlying substrate (ice vs. soil) also contributes to community turnover, likely by providing access to distinct local cell reservoirs during melt progression. Collectively, these factors shape the taxonomic composition, morphotype assemblage, and spatial development of red snow blooms.
This study uses microscopy and DNA sequencing to examine the spatial heterogeneity of snow algae across an elevation gradient in Alaska. The study presents an important comparison of supraglacial snow compared to snow over soils and presents evidence that factors related to snowmelt including snow depth and elevation are important factors in snow algae phenotype as well as potential underlying substrate (e.g., ice vs. soil). The manuscript and data are exceptionally well written and presented and the data and findings will be of interest to a broad audience. I have a handful of comments for improvement:
Line 67: Deposition could still be local. Perhaps a more specific description is needed here.
Lines 105-106: Why the different depths? Based on Figure 2, snow algae are in the snowpack below 2 cm.Â
Line 130: Is the 100 cells true for each sample, for both geometric size and diameter?
Line 149: Remove reaction (redundant with PCR)
Line 210: I like this comparison but I’m confused about the surface vs. subsurface samples. I think the methods need to be updated to better describe the sample collection.Â
For figure 3, nitrate and ammonium cannot be 0. They would be below the limit of detection. These data points should not be shown on the graph because these numbers do not exist to plot.Â
Line 232: Abundant is probably more accurate than dominated