Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2765
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2765
02 Jun 2026
 | 02 Jun 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion.

A surrogate-assisted preliminary screening workflow for hypothetical fixed-location check-dam height scenarios in debris-flow mitigation

Jun Katagiri, Hidetaka Saomoto, and Takayuki Shinohara

Abstract. Early-stage debris-flow mitigation planning often requires comparison of multiple countermeasure scenarios before detailed engineering design information is available. This study presents a surrogate-assisted preliminary screening workflow for comparing hypothetical fixed-location check-dam height scenarios using simplified proxy metrics. A depth-integrated debris-flow simulation model was applied to a terrain dataset from the area affected by the 2021 Atami debris-flow disaster in Japan. The analysis is not intended as a forensic reproduction of the event or as an assessment of existing or planned facilities. In total, 4,877 simulation cases were generated by varying the heights of six candidate check dams using Latin hypercube sampling. The simulation results were used to train surrogate models relating dam-height scenarios to the maximum downstream debris-flow depth, used here as a hazard-intensity proxy, while the sum of dam heights was used as a height-based proxy for construction-related effort. A multilayer perceptron provided the best coarse-grained approximation and enabled repeated surrogate-based searches under different trade-off weights. The screened scenarios formed a limited number of representative trade-off regimes. However, physics-based re-evaluation showed non-negligible discrepancies between surrogate-predicted and simulated depths, indicating that the workflow should be used for candidate screening rather than final quantitative design evaluation.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Jun Katagiri, Hidetaka Saomoto, and Takayuki Shinohara

Status: open

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Jun Katagiri, Hidetaka Saomoto, and Takayuki Shinohara
Jun Katagiri, Hidetaka Saomoto, and Takayuki Shinohara

Viewed

Total article views: 62 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
43 12 7 62 5 5
  • HTML: 43
  • PDF: 12
  • XML: 7
  • Total: 62
  • BibTeX: 5
  • EndNote: 5
Views and downloads (calculated since 02 Jun 2026)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 02 Jun 2026)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 56 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 56 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 04 Jun 2026
Download
Short summary
Communities at risk from fast-moving muddy floods often need to compare many protection plans before detailed designs are available. We tested a workflow that combines many computer simulations with a fast prediction model to compare possible heights for six barrier dams in a real mountain valley in Japan. The method grouped promising options, but follow-up simulations showed that the fast model alone can be misleading. It should screen ideas for further study, not make final design decisions.
Share