the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Rating telecommunication towers by social importance and physical vulnerability to wildfire
Abstract. Telecommunication infrastructure and the service it provides is vital for notifying threatened populations during wildfire events to ensure timely and safe evacuations. Much of the telecommunication infrastructure in the province of Alberta, Canada, is situated in fire-prone regions, with over 600 individual cell tower sites within the Forest Protection Area (FPA). Proactive measures such as fuel reduction treatments can reduce risk to communication infrastructure and support community resilience, but with limited resources available, there is a need to prioritize the most important and vulnerable towers for protective action. This study presents a structured framework for rating telecommunication infrastructure based on multiple factors of vulnerability. We developed an index that combines indicators of social importance (network redundancy, robustness, and intersection with developed lands and transportation infrastructure) and indicators of physical vulnerability to wildfire (fire exposure, directional vulnerability, slope, and suppression capability) to rate telecommunication towers in Alberta's FPA. In total, 34 telecommunication towers were identified as having both high social importance and high physical vulnerability to wildfire, with almost a quarter located in a single region, the Grande Prairie Forest Area. Potential applications of our Social Importance and Physical Vulnerability (SIPV) Index for informing protection and mitigation decisions are discussed.
- Preprint
(5702 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 25 Mar 2026)
- RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-276', Anonymous Referee #1, 03 Feb 2026 reply
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-276', Anonymous Referee #1, 03 Feb 2026
reply
Publisher’s note: this comment is a copy of RC1 and its content was therefore removed on 3 February 2026.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-276-RC2 -
RC3: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-276', Anonymous Referee #1, 03 Feb 2026
reply
Publisher’s note: this comment is a copy of RC1 and its content was therefore removed on 3 February 2026.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-276-RC3 -
RC4: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-276', Anonymous Referee #1, 03 Feb 2026
reply
Publisher’s note: this comment is a copy of RC1 and its content was therefore removed on 3 February 2026.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-276-RC4 -
RC5: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-276', Anonymous Referee #1, 03 Feb 2026
reply
Publisher’s note: this comment is a copy of RC1 and its content was therefore removed on 3 February 2026.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-276-RC5 -
RC6: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-276', Anonymous Referee #1, 03 Feb 2026
reply
Publisher’s note: this comment is a copy of RC1 and its content was therefore removed on 3 February 2026.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-276-RC6
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 138 | 47 | 24 | 209 | 11 | 26 |
- HTML: 138
- PDF: 47
- XML: 24
- Total: 209
- BibTeX: 11
- EndNote: 26
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
I have now read the manuscript with the title: “Rating telecommunication towers by social importance and physical vulnerability to wildfire”. The paper is among the few studies that focus on the vulnerability of critical infrastructure to wildfire and that integrate physical vulnerability with societal importance. Research in this direction is both necessary and highly timely, particularly in light of the 2023 EU Directive on the Resilience of Critical Entities. The paper is well written and clearly structured. Nevertheless, it would benefit from a clearer presentation of the method. I also have some additional comments that would improve the paper significantly and that I strongly believe should be addressed prior to publication. These include:
Score
Indicator
1
2
3
4
Slope
0-10°
10°-20°
20°-30°
> 30°
Agueda et al. 2023: https://doi.org/10.1071/WF22134
Papathoma-Köhle et al. 2025: https://doi.org/10.1071/WF24114