the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Rapid detection of centimeter-scale change in a Mars analog environment using ground-based mobile LiDAR
Abstract. Landed missions to dynamic planetary surfaces require tools capable of measuring the small-scale topographic changes driven by active surface processes. A ground-based LiDAR scanner is one of the few instruments capable of detecting the centimeter-scale changes that are expected due to both natural processes such as wind erosion and sedimentary reworking, as well as artificial processes resulting from robotic/human exploration. At landing site scales, a ground-based LiDAR scanner on a mobile platform can collect cm-scale topographic information more efficiently than using a scanner on a stationary mount. To demonstrate the viability of mobile LiDAR for planetary missions, we conducted scans at a Mars analog site in central Iceland. Scans before and after a windstorm detected erosion and deposition of sand on the order of a few cm, with a detection threshold of ~1 cm. The ability of the mobile platform to collect data over extremely short timescales (<30 minutes) made it possible to conduct spontaneous scans to record opportunistic targets after the windstorm, while maintaining cm-scale resolution. This makes a compelling case for the inclusion of mobile LiDAR on future missions to explore planetary surfaces such as the Moon, Mars and Titan.
- Preprint
(1383 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 07 Jul 2026)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-2733', Anonymous Referee #1, 01 Jun 2026
reply
- The topic is very interesting and relevant, good introduction into it.
- There is no GNSS on Mars. That (and the consequences) should already be mentioned in the introduction, not only in the discussion at the end.
- Why was the Riegl VUX-1HA chosen? Is 1550 nm the ideal wavelength for the purpose? Why didn’t you choose a scanner with phase shift based distance measurement, which should provide significantly better distance measurement precision?
- 2.1: Why is it necessary to manually pick point pairs in two datasets here? With very good approximate valuas available, multi-temporal point cloud registration could easily be automated, see for instance the ISPRS Com. II proceedings 2024 (https://isprs-annals.copernicus.org/articles/X-2-2024.
- The results look good on first glimpse. However, a detailed analysis of precision and reliability id missing. You mention cm-precision, but is that really substantiated by the results? Especially, it would have been nice to have independent external reference measurements, which shouldn’t be too difficult in such a study on Earth.
- I found the statements on the possibilities of registration in GNSS-denied settings too vague, especially concerning the effects on the desired cm-precision. Why were these alternatives not examined in the study? And could SLAM be an option?
ReplyCitation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2733-RC1
Data sets
Backpack LiDAR scans from a sand covered lava margin at Holuhraun (Iceland) Vanga, S., Perkins, R. P., Neish, C. D., Zanetti, M. R., Carr, B. B. and Hamilton, C. W. https://doi.org/10.5069/G92805VK
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 37 | 15 | 8 | 60 | 3 | 2 |
- HTML: 37
- PDF: 15
- XML: 8
- Total: 60
- BibTeX: 3
- EndNote: 2
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1