Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2730
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2730
27 May 2026
 | 27 May 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).

Estimating Twomey forcing sensitivity to aerosol plume spreading rates

Lucas A. McMichael, Ehsan Erfani, Robert Wood, and Knut von Salzen

Abstract. The amount of sunlight that reaches Earth's surface can be reduced by increasing cloud droplet number and decreasing droplet size (i.e., Twomey forcing), a central idea underpinning the Marine Cloud Brightening strategy. Cloud albedo depends nonlinearly on cloud droplet concentration, meaning the spatial extent of aerosol plumes could be an important constraint on the brightening potential. Horizontal spreading of aerosols can be simulated by Langevin particle models, which depend on turbulence characteristics and precipitation. The turbulence information that drives the particle model is derived from a library of realistic, 2-day LES cases, spanning northeast Pacific stratocumulus conditions. The 2-D reflectance fields from the LES are superimposed onto the 2-D perturbed aerosol concentrations to calculate the 2-D Twomey forcing response.

The Day 1 and Day 2 LES regimes have distinct meteorological, aerosol, and turbulence characteristics associated with equatorward movement of the LES domain. Our results indicate that the Day 2 regime has substantially faster plume spreading than Day 1, with ensemble median differences exceeding 2 km hr-1. Despite these differences, Twomey forcing is insensitive to the natural variability in spreading rate. This study suggests that Twomey forcing is resilient to variations in meteorology, aerosols, and turbulence, with its efficacy governed primarily by aerosol lifetimes and assumptions surrounding cloud adjustments. Although the natural variation in spreading rate does not materially affect Twomey forcing, idealized plume spreading simulations suggest that current GCM assumptions of an infinitely fast spreading rate could lead to a 10-200% overestimation of cooling.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Lucas A. McMichael, Ehsan Erfani, Robert Wood, and Knut von Salzen

Status: open (until 08 Jul 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Lucas A. McMichael, Ehsan Erfani, Robert Wood, and Knut von Salzen
Lucas A. McMichael, Ehsan Erfani, Robert Wood, and Knut von Salzen
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 27 May 2026
Download
Short summary
This study explores how aerosol plumes spread in marine clouds and how that affects cloud brightening. Changes in turbulence strongly affect plume spreading rates, but have little effect on the overall brightening in the cases studied. The main uncertainties are aerosol lifetime and how clouds adjust to the aerosols. Climate models often assume that plumes spread instantly, and we find that this may overestimate cooling in some cases.
Share