Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2682
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2682
03 Jun 2026
 | 03 Jun 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Earth System Dynamics (ESD).

Potential natural vegetation as overlooked determinant of land-use change flux estimates

Adrian I. R. Jäschke, Wolfgang A. Obermeier, Clemens Schwingshackl, Amali A. Amali, Julia Pongratz, and Raphael Ganzenmüller

Abstract. The net carbon dioxide (CO2) flux from land use and land-use change (FLUC) is a major driver of anthropogenic climate change and central to mitigation strategies for achieving global emission reduction targets. Despite its importance, estimates of FLUC are characterized by large uncertainties. In models quantifying FLUC, the spatial distribution of potential natural vegetation (PNV) is a key component, but its influence on FLUC estimates has not been systematically quantified. Here, we address this gap by combining pollen-based biome reconstructions and observation-based datasets of environmental conditions with machine learning to derive global PNV maps. Compared to existing PNV maps, our approach improves the representation of biome-specific spatial heterogeneity and provides sensitivity maps for quantifying how assumptions about potential forest and grassland distribution propagate into FLUC estimates. Implementing the PNV maps as Plant Functional Types (PFTs) in the bookkeeping model BLUE, we find global cumulative FLUC for the period 1850–2023 to be 16 % (6–27 %) higher than the default estimate. Differences at the regional scale are often even larger. Our results demonstrate that uncertainties in PNV distribution represent a substantial and previously overlooked source of uncertainty in FLUC estimates, comparable in magnitude to other key sources. Accurate PNV mapping is therefore essential for robust FLUC estimates, particularly at regional scales, which are required for understanding the global carbon cycle, improving FLUC modeling, and informing effective climate mitigation policies.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Adrian I. R. Jäschke, Wolfgang A. Obermeier, Clemens Schwingshackl, Amali A. Amali, Julia Pongratz, and Raphael Ganzenmüller

Status: open (until 15 Jul 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Adrian I. R. Jäschke, Wolfgang A. Obermeier, Clemens Schwingshackl, Amali A. Amali, Julia Pongratz, and Raphael Ganzenmüller
Adrian I. R. Jäschke, Wolfgang A. Obermeier, Clemens Schwingshackl, Amali A. Amali, Julia Pongratz, and Raphael Ganzenmüller
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 03 Jun 2026
Download
Short summary
We provide the first assessment of how potential natural vegetation (PNV) assumptions affect CO2 fluxes from land-use change (FLUC) by combining pollen records and environmental data with machine learning to produce global PNV maps. Using the bookkeeping model BLUE, we find that global cumulative FLUC emissions are 16 % higher than previous estimates, with large regional differences. Our results highlight that PNV is a previously overlooked but substantial uncertainty source in FLUC estimates.
Share