the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Evaluating Vis–NIR spectroscopy for laboratory and in-situ prediction of forest soil organic carbon fractions
Abstract. Forest soil organic carbon (SOC) stability is influenced by its relative composition of particulate organic carbon (POC) and mineral-associated organic carbon (MAOC) fractions. However, conventional SOC fractionation methods are labor-intensive and restrict large-scale monitoring of SOC dynamics. Visible–near infrared (Vis–NIR) spectroscopy offers a rapid alternative, yet its applicability for predicting SOC fractions in forest soils under field conditions remains poorly understood. This study developed an integrated framework to evaluate the feasibility of in-situ Vis–NIR spectroscopy for predicting SOC fractions by comparing four in-situ application workflows, including direct laboratory-to-field transfer, EPO-assisted transfer, direct in-situ modeling, and EPO-assisted in-situ modeling. Direct transfer of laboratory models to in-situ spectra resulted in substantial performance degradation due to moisture-driven spectral domain shifts (POC: R² = 0.80; MAOC: R² = 0.59). In contrast, direct in-situ modeling. The highest accuracy for POC was achieved using EPO-corrected in-situ spectra (R² = 0.90), whereas MAOC prediction performed best using uncorrected in-situ spectra (R² = 0.71). Independent cross-year validation further demonstrated that environmental variability, particularly soil moisture, constrained model robustness. The analysis of the fitted models revealed distinct spectral mechanisms controlling SOC fraction predictions, linking POC to shortwave infrared organo–clay absorption features (~2200 nm) and MAOC to visible wavelengths associated with iron oxides. These findings highlight the conditional feasibility of in-situ Vis–NIR spectroscopy for forest SOC fraction prediction and guide field-based soil carbon monitoring.
- Preprint
(2023 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(520 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: final response (author comments only)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-2666', Anonymous Referee #1, 05 Aug 2026
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2026/egusphere-2026-2666/egusphere-2026-2666-RC1-supplement.pdfCitation: https://doi.org/
10.5194/egusphere-2026-2666-RC1 -
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-2666', Anonymous Referee #2, 06 Aug 2026
This manuscript evaluated Vis–NIR spectroscopy for laboratory and in-situ prediction of forest soil organic carbon fractions. Authors found that the highest accuracy for POC was achieved using EPO-corrected in-situ spectra (R² = 0.90), whereas MAOC prediction performed best using uncorrected in-situ spectra (R² = 0.71). The investigated topic is interesting for the forest ecosystem and this manuscript is generally well-written with clear objective, solid methodology and insightful discussion. However, several limitations should be addressed before acceptance: (1) authors should provide more deep discussion on the better model performance of POC than MAOC, which is in contract to most of current studies; (2) authors can provide more information on the performance difference among topsoil and subsoil since the subsoil is getting more attention due to limited understanding. (3) please carefully check the formatting in the whole manuscript.
Specific comments:
Line 22: It is not clear the difference between EPO-assisted transfer and EPO-assisted in-situ modelling.
Line 24: In contrast, direct in-situ modeling, this sentence is not complete.
Lines 28-29: Generally, MAOC is associated to clay minerals, while the finding here shows that POC is linked to organo–clay absorption features. Any explanation for this?
Line 59: Please make the citations consistent (R. A. Viscarra Rossel et al., 2006; Rossel and Behrens, 2010).
Lines 64-65: Indeed, there are much more studies on prediction SOC fractions using vis-NIR spectroscopy. Please see some examples below and provide a comprehensive review on previous work.
Viscarra Rossel, R. A., and W. S. Hicks. "Soil organic carbon and its fractions estimated by visible–near infrared transfer functions." European Journal of Soil Science 66.3 (2015): 438-450.
Cayuela‐Sánchez, José A., and Rafael López‐Núñez. "Compositional Data Methods and VISNIRS to Predict Soil Organic Carbon Contents." European Journal of Soil Science 76.5 (2025): e70200.
O'Rourke, S. M., and N. M. Holden. "Determination of soil organic matter and carbon fractions in forest top soils using spectral data acquired from visible–near infrared hyperspectral images." Soil Science Society of America Journal 76.2 (2012): 586-596.
Lines 130-131: Were laboratory spectra measured on the dried soil samples sieved through a 0.15-mm mesh?
Line 164: Better to mention Location-based KS algorithms in the flowchart.
Line 257: RPIQ would be more robust than RPD.
Lines 294-300: It would be more informative to present the difference among different depth intervals.
Lines 459-501: Based on a recent review by Ding et al. (2026), MAOC can be better predicted than POC, which is against the findings in this work. Please provide deep discussion on this point.
Ding, S., Xu, Y., Agathokleous, E., Li, T., Zheng, H., & Feng, Z. (2026). A global synthesis of spectroscopy-based prediction accuracy for soil carbon fractions: A systematic review. Soil and Tillage Research, 262, 107242.
Some references are not complete and correctly cited, such as Dai, L., 2025 (the journal information is missing), Rossel, R.A.V. (should be Viscarra Rossel, R.A.), Behrens, T., 2010.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2666-RC2
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 140 | 45 | 13 | 198 | 43 | 8 | 13 |
- HTML: 140
- PDF: 45
- XML: 13
- Total: 198
- Supplement: 43
- BibTeX: 8
- EndNote: 13
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1