Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2665
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2665
13 Jul 2026
 | 13 Jul 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences (NHESS).

Cascading Wildfire–Atmospheric River Hazards: Postfire Flood Risk after the 2025 Eaton Fire

Fehmida Rafi, Daniel Rowland, and Shang Gao

Abstract. Wildfires and extreme precipitation events increasingly interact under a warming climate, yet their combined hydrologic impacts remain poorly characterized. In fire-prone regions such as Southern California, atmospheric rivers (ARs) can both promote wildfire through antecedent vegetation growth and trigger severe flooding in postfire landscapes. This study evaluates the compound flood risk associated with a strong AR event occurring after the 2025 Eaton Fire by examining both its likelihood and hydrologic consequences. Historical AR records were analyzed to assess the probability of sequential-year strong AR events, and an event-based hydrologic modeling framework (AGWA/KINEROS2) was used to characterize watershed response under prefire and postfire conditions using precipitation analogous to the February 2024 AR. Results indicate that strong AR events (Scale ≥ 3) occur with a mean annual frequency of 0.51 and a 38 % probability of recurrence in consecutive years, supporting the plausibility of a postfire AR scenario. Simulations show that wildfire-induced landscape changes amplify downstream flood response, increasing runoff volume by approximately 6 % and sediment yield by about 50 % in channels immediately below the burned area. Sequential storm pulses further enhanced postfire impacts, with the second flood peak increasing by ~30 % relative to prefire conditions. These findings demonstrate that wildfire and AR events act as interconnected hazards whose cascading effects can intensify flood and erosion risks. By linking event probability with watershed-scale hydrologic response, this study provides a framework for assessing postfire flood hazards under compound climate extremes and underscores the need for integrated risk management in fire-affected regions.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Fehmida Rafi, Daniel Rowland, and Shang Gao

Status: open (until 24 Aug 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Fehmida Rafi, Daniel Rowland, and Shang Gao
Fehmida Rafi, Daniel Rowland, and Shang Gao
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 13 Jul 2026
Download
Short summary
Wildfires can increase flood risk when intense storms occur afterward. Using the 2025 Eaton Fire in Southern California as a case study, we combined historical storm records with computer simulations to examine how burned landscapes respond to heavy rainfall. We found that wildfire damage can increase runoff and sediment movement during later storms, highlighting the growing risk of connected climate hazards in fire-prone regions.
Share