Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2662
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2662
29 May 2026
 | 29 May 2026
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).

Atmospheric methane growth rates, 2018-2024, driven mainly by emission changes but atmospheric photochemistry is important

Liang Feng, Paul I. Palmer, Haolin Wang, Robert Parker, Hartmut Boesch, Sébastien C. Biraud, Łukasz Chmura, Emanuel Gloor, László Haszpra, Elena Kozlova, Euan G. Nisbet, Steffen M. Noe, Thomas Röckmann, Rodrigo Augusto Ferreira de Souza, and Martin Steinbacher

Abstract. Global atmospheric methane growth rate has increased dramatically since 2007, peaking in 2021, yet the relative roles of emissions and atmospheric oxidation remain uncertain. Accurate attribution is essential for climate mitigation because emissions-driven and chemistry-driven changes imply fundamentally different policy responses. Here we investigate global methane production and loss from 2018 to 2024 using an ensemble Kalman filter coupled to the GEOS‑Chem model. We employ two methane inversion configurations: assuming climatological monthly OH distributions or jointly optimizing zonal mean OH with methane. The joint inversion reveals substantial interannual variability in OH, including an ~18% decline in 2020 followed by a recovery in subsequent years. Accounting for this variability reduces the inferred 2019–2020 emission increase by ~63% (14±6 Tg/yr versus 37±5.5 Tg/yr with fixed OH), demonstrating that changes in OH strongly influences source attribution. The total increased methane loss, 2024 minus 2019, is about 31±6 Tg/yr, including a temperature‑driven increase of the OH+methane reaction rate that represents about 40% of the total sink increase. Most of the sink variations originate from the tropics, where the largest shifts in emission occur.  Despite year-to-year variations, emissions remain the primary driver of changes in the methane growth rate change, except in 2020.  Both inversions identify significant emission reductions over tropical South America in 2023–2024, likely linked to regional drought. Broadly, our results underscore the necessity of jointly estimating methane sources and sinks to interpret recent atmospheric methane trends. 

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Liang Feng, Paul I. Palmer, Haolin Wang, Robert Parker, Hartmut Boesch, Sébastien C. Biraud, Łukasz Chmura, Emanuel Gloor, László Haszpra, Elena Kozlova, Euan G. Nisbet, Steffen M. Noe, Thomas Röckmann, Rodrigo Augusto Ferreira de Souza, and Martin Steinbacher

Status: open (until 10 Jul 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Liang Feng, Paul I. Palmer, Haolin Wang, Robert Parker, Hartmut Boesch, Sébastien C. Biraud, Łukasz Chmura, Emanuel Gloor, László Haszpra, Elena Kozlova, Euan G. Nisbet, Steffen M. Noe, Thomas Röckmann, Rodrigo Augusto Ferreira de Souza, and Martin Steinbacher
Liang Feng, Paul I. Palmer, Haolin Wang, Robert Parker, Hartmut Boesch, Sébastien C. Biraud, Łukasz Chmura, Emanuel Gloor, László Haszpra, Elena Kozlova, Euan G. Nisbet, Steffen M. Noe, Thomas Röckmann, Rodrigo Augusto Ferreira de Souza, and Martin Steinbacher
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 29 May 2026
Download
Short summary
This study examines the relative roles of emissions and oxidation in recent rapid methane growth. Using an ensemble Kalman filter, we quantify global methane sources and sinks for 2018–2024. Emission changes dominate the increase, except in 2020 when a COVID‑19‑related OH decline strongly affected sinks. Atmospheric photochemistry—including OH and CH₄ variability and temperature‑dependent oxidation—also significantly shapes the methane budget.
Share