the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Geometric in-flight calibration of MAJIS (JUICE) during early cruise phase and LEGA flyby
Abstract. In August 2024, MAJIS, the visible and infrared mapping spectrometer onboard the ESA-Juice spacecraft, collected its first observations of resolved targets during Lunar and Earth Gravity Assist maneuver (LEGA). One month before, during payload checkout 2 (PC2), MAJIS performed two starfield observations to evaluate its post-launch geometric performances that can be compared with the LEGA data. This work presents an overview of the spatial distribution of the MAJIS signal collected at different scan angles and their position in MAJIS field of view. In PC2 starfields, 14 stars were identified, allowing us to derive a new in-flight alignment with an accuracy of 0.7 ± 0.4 MAJIS instantaneous field of view (IFOV). The offset between the nominal boresight of Juice remote sensing platform (+Z) and MAJIS boresight was evaluated to be 27 samples (along-slit) and 31 lines (cross-slit). With this new alignment, MAJIS observations on the Moon are co-aligned with JANUS camera with an accuracy of 2.2 ± 0.9 IFOV which could be improved to 1.1 ± 0.6 IFOV with bundle adjustment. A comparison of MAJIS Earth observations with simultaneous weather satellites observations confirmed that the MAJIS alignment is accurate for the full close Earth flyby. Residual misalignments with JANUS and NavCam remain visible in the Earth dataset but they can be easily corrected using small timing and scan angle adjustments (<10 IFOV). The instrument and frame kernels for MAJIS will be updated on the basis of these results. The improved co-alignment between MAJIS, JANUS and NavCam ensures strong synergy between the remote sensing instruments during the nominal scientific phase when they operate at the same time.
- Preprint
(7850 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 15 Jul 2026)
- RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2026-2655', Anonymous Referee #1, 15 Jun 2026 reply
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 65 | 32 | 12 | 109 | 9 | 6 |
- HTML: 65
- PDF: 32
- XML: 12
- Total: 109
- BibTeX: 9
- EndNote: 6
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
Thank for letting me reviews this work, it is very good and represents an important contribution to the community. The presentation is clear, the language is precise, and the conclusions regarding the updated instrument boresight and SPICE reference frames are well supported. This work is essential to ensure the co-alignment and synergy between MAJIS, JANUS, and NavCam during the nominal mission at Jupiter.
I would like to see this published, after addressing some minor comments I have.
Comments :
Suggestion: The authors state this is "still under investigation", I would suggest they add a brief discussion or hypothesis regarding the physical cause. Is it a result of the high-speed slew motion during the Earth flyby compared to the inertial pointing of starfields? Providing even a preliminary error budget for the -1.1s temporal shift identified in the Earth-JANUS comparison would be highly valuable.
-----------
Suggestion: The authors should clarify if they have investigated the source of this potential sub-second latency. Is this a known internal clock drift within the MAJIS instrument, or a trigger delay in the scan mirror mechanism?.
Quantifying this would help other JUICE instrument teams (like JANUS or NavCam) who are also performing cross-calibrations.
-----------
The authors admit that the dominant source of uncertainty in the new TKFRAME alignment is the rotation around the spacecraft +Z axis, which might reflect a misalignment between the mirror rotation axis and the slit.
Suggestion: Clarify if the author plan to use the more recent PC4 data (February 2026) which to specifically refine this mirror axis parameter before the final publication or in future works. Additionally, there is a mention that the linearity between mirror steps and viewing scan angles still needs further in-flight validation. A brief comment on whether ground-calibration linearity holds true in-flight would strengthen the "Conclusions and perspectives" section.
-----------
A major lesson learned in the paper is the need for synchronized observations between MAJIS, JANUS, and NavCam,.
Suggestion: The authors could be more specific in their recommendation to the JUICE SOC (Science Operations Center). For example, they could suggest a maximum allowable time-offset between instrument triggers to ensure the common coverage needed for geometric context during windowing modes.
-----------
While the raw data is under embargo until 2029, the manuscript mentions that the source code to reproduce these results will be available on the Nantes University Gitlab.
Suggestion (probably not needed, authors are aware of this) : I strongly suggest the authors provide a persistent DOI for this code repository upon publication. This ensures that the geometric reconstruction methods , such as the sub-pixel centroiding described in Section 3.2, are transparent and usable by the wider community.
----------- Minor