Impact of satellite observations on assimilation inversion of high-resolution urban-scale carbon dioxide fluxes
Abstract. Cities are major sources of global carbon. Accurately quantifying urban-scale carbon dioxide (CO2) fluxes is essential for supporting targeted emission reduction policies and effective monitoring. To address the limitations in the accuracy of current urban carbon emission estimates, we developed FEISSO, an urban-scale CO2 flux inversion system that integrates a Lagrangian atmospheric transport model with a Bayesian assimilation framework. FEISSO was used to systematically explore the feasibility of retrieving high-resolution flux distributions from satellite-based XCO2 observations. Sensitivity experiments were conducted in Weifang, Chengdu, and Xining (China) to identify key influencing factors in CO2 flux inversion. Results show that the resolution of meteorological drivers substantially affects the accuracy of simulated transport trajectories, with higher resolution (0.25°) improving the spatial fidelity of flux retrieval. Sensitivity analysis indicates that the column-averaged CO2 observation error and the total error for the inversion domain are the dominant factors affecting the total flux estimates, and they induce a "seesaw" effect in the spatial distribution of emissions. In contrast, prior flux error and spatial correlation length for land have limited influence on the total emissions but primarily affect the spatial pattern of weak emission regions and the smoothness of flux fields, respectively. Differences in topography and meteorological conditions across cities govern the temporal response of flux estimates to observations. With optimized parameter settings, the system successfully retrieved 10-days of total CO2 emissions for Weifang, Chengdu, and Xining, showing overall consistency with EDGAR and local inventory data. The retrieved emissions correspond to 85.8 %, 190.42 %, and 86.4 % of the EDGAR estimates for the three cities, respectively, while the relative differences from local inventories are 2.3 % for Weifang and 10.9 % for Xining. The results from this study demonstrate the applicability and scalability of the FEISSO system for urban CO2 flux estimation. In this study, the frequency of urban-scale inversions was limited by the current orbital coverage of the OCO-2 satellite. With future improvements in satellite observation capabilities, particularly in spatial resolution and revisit frequency, FEISSO is expected to play a pivotal role in global urban carbon emission monitoring and in the evaluation of emission reduction policy.
Dear authors,
Unfortunately, after checking your manuscript, it has come to our attention that it does not comply with our "Code and Data Policy".
https://www.geoscientific-model-development.net/policies/code_and_data_policy.html
Your manuscript does not contain a Code Avaliability section. You must provide one with links to repositories that comply with the requirements exposed in the policy and containing all the code used to perform the work presented here. Also, in your Data Availability section you have not provided all the data used in the work presented in your manuscript. You must provide all the datasets used for training or running models and for validation of results. Due to this, your manuscript should have not been accepted for Discussions and review in the journal.
The GMD review and publication process depends on reviewers and community commentators being able to access, during the discussion phase, the code and data on which a manuscript depends, and on ensuring the provenance of replicability of the published papers for years after their publication. Please, therefore, publish your code and data in one of the appropriate repositories and reply to this comment with the relevant information (link and a permanent identifier for it (e.g. DOI)) as soon as possible. We cannot have manuscripts under discussion that do not comply with our policy.
Later, if the Topical Editor decides to continue with the review or publication process of your manuscript and you are requested to upload a new version of it, then The 'Code and Data Availability’ section of your manuscript must also be modified to cite the new repository locations, and corresponding references added to the bibliography.
I must note that if you do not fix this problem, we cannot continue with the peer-review process or accept your manuscript for publication in GMD.
Juan A. Añel
Geosci. Model Dev. Executive Editor